Talk:Georgia State Route 10

This article was nominated for deletion on 290106. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Atlanta task force (assessed as High-importance).

Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta
Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs.
Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention
- Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get Atlanta into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

U.S. Roads: Georgia Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Georgia
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Untitled comments

This needs more references (and easier to read references), but otherwise it is a completed article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Panoptical (talk • contribs) 15:27, 8 December 2006‎ (UTC)[reply]

Split Athens loop

Not exactly sure why this was merged, but I see NE2 has proposed a split of the Athens loop material into its own article. I also think it should be split into its own article. What do other people think? T C N7JM 22:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had asked in either the IRC channel or the WikiProject and was told that it should be merged into this page. If it should not be so, then can someone explain their reasoning? Thanks. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 23:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I just figured out that, if you count unsigned highways, then the southeastern part of this route actually has eight highways concurrent, and should have special mention on the concurrency page. Also, a mention in this section/page should be added. The roads are:

US 29 / US 78 / US 129 / US 441 / SR 8 / SR 10 Loop / SR 15 / SR 422! Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I support splitting out the Athens loop as it has enough of a description and history independent of the SR 10 article to have its own article. Dough 48 72 00:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure if it should be re-split out, but, if it gets done or not, it needs a major rewrite. Also, the exit list needs to be revamped correctly. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about it needs a major rewrite? I just wrote the bulk of that route description last December. It has the citations and everything. All it needs is to be touched up, and a couple of missing citations added, if you ask me. T C N7JM 16:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought it needed a rewrite. It definitely needs some touching up, but I defer to one of you more experienced editors. If you read the "Bannered routes" section, you will see that there used to be another loop in Washington. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 04:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support splitting. It's a beltway, more important than SR 10 (which is mostly a carrier route for US 78). Also: are there other SR 10 Loops? If not, the disambiguation is unnecessary. --NE2 11:49, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support splitting. It can hold its own. --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Split Request

NOT DONE

(non-admin closure) The article was not split. –Fredddie ™ 19:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This page is getting long, what I think is that:

Each county segment shall become separate articles except for Columbia and Richmond counties
There shall be a separate article for the concurrency of U.S. Routes 78 and 278 for both segments

Thanks 2600:1700:6180:6290:28B0:221A:EFC0:6E5B (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose—this highway is only 172 miles in length, so the content just needs to be trimmed down. We don't need a turn-by-turn-by-turn description of the route of a highway at this level of unending detail. There's no precedent for county-level sub articles, nor should there be. Imzadi 1979 → 22:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to put this in perspective, the following Featured Articles are on highways that are similar in length or longer than this one:

List

So if we can write articles judged to be "Wikipedia's finest work" on these highways without the need to further split them, then we can do the same for this highway. Additionally, this is far from the only article on a highway in Georgia that has suffered from needless verbosity. They all need to be fixed because no one will bother to read these endless walls of text. Imzadi 1979 → 22:56, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.