Jump to content

Talk:Georges Ernest Boulanger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

This encyclopedic entry about Georges Boulanger, the French military general who turned into an influential politician in the 1880’s, has its strengths and weaknesses. Within the article, it is asserted by the author that influence of Boulanger upon France was positive, or at the very least not entirely negative. The list of accomplishments and awards won by Boulanger at the beginning makes the reader attribute a fair amount of prestige and respect to the French general. Later in the article, despite Boulanger’s involvement with intrigue and deception, the scandals are described as “brief” and “minor” in importance. His intricately described popularity amongst the French people is an example of the author asserting that while Boulanger may have been a controversial figure, his presence in France was not entirely negative.

First of all, this article does not have a single author - it has two or more. It has me as the one to have contributed most, but I have done so only by translating what's on the French version. What I did was to join new text with existing one, and the sentences you object to most, I'm glad to say, were there to begin with. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I certainly don't think Boulanger's role was positive! I don't think the author of the French article thinks that, since I had to remove some partisan sentences in what I was translating. Please, don't assume. I translated that bit about his early life because all wiki articles I've seen give such detail: can I help it if he had won something or taken part in something else? Plus, you must really be fond of colonialism, if you consider his role to have been necessarily "positive" (in Vietnam or Tunis) - it was as good or as wrong as the French attitutes at the time, and he briefly stood for all the wrong ones (if you ask me).Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The major implicit assumption that the author makes in this article is that while Boulanger’s actual political power was small and his will weak, his significant historical imprint can be seen on France’s political landscape and popular mindset. Only after extensively explaining the rise of the boulangisme and the changes they tried to implement within French society is the fact that Boulanger and his boulangistes were a minority in the French Chamber of Deputies dealt with.

Again, this is because of this article being about him. You assume that, since sentences were assigned an order, that order must have been trying to induce something. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the movement was a minority at a national level some months after it came about, and had probably ammessed popularity to an even higher level after the elections. Dahn 17:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The popular image of Boulanger upon his black horse was the “idol of the Parisian population” and his extensive following amongst many types of political factions are facts cited by the author that highlight Boulanger’s importance despite some of his shortcomings.

The sentence was already in there. I wanted to remove it, as it is a tad to lyrical, but then I thought someone else would if is that illogical. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This implicit belief held by the author makes the most convincing subject presented within this article the popularity of Boulanger. Stories of the masses preventing his departure from Paris, being wooed by multiple constituencies at once, and strong electoral support despite being unable to legally run for office are influential in citing the fame of Boulanger.

Surely, he must have had some kind of fame since that has happened! I'm not gonna say: hey, look, that must meant that the fella wasn't that bad! Simply because I don't think fame is legitimacy, and I'm guessing neither did the author of the original version! Again, you assume a lot, and what I could assume on the basis of it is that you consider others idiots who could be easily impressed and are too gregarious to be objective. At best, mention of his popularity goes hand in hand with the hybrid nature of his dogma - and I belive his personal mix is made clear throughout the article. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there are several things about this article that could be improved upon. The weakly supported assertion made at the very end of the entry concerning the link between boulangisme and Fascism is among the first things that need to be addressed. It seems like the author was trying to lend legitimacy to his article by bringing in the ideas of an historian, yet he left this thought unsupported and naked without any explanation beyond a simple mention. Had even one more sentence been used to clarify what Sternhell meant in linking boulangisme and Fascism, it would leave the reader with a better final impression of the entry. Citation of sources used in the writing of this article would also help to strengthen the content of this article.

Look, I couldn't cite the exact source, as I hadn't read the book. But we have this thing on wikipedia: inter-wiki links, whereby a word turns blue and clicking it leads to the article on the topic. Plus, to my knowledge, the book isn't about Boulanger as much as it is about the rise of Fascism. Even though I haven't read the book, I know a bit on the subject: that's precisely why I wanted to keep mention of this brief. Consider the mention of Action Française/Cercle Proudhon in the article. Should I really expand on what that is, when people can just click on the name and get a full article dealing with it in way more detail than this article could and should? Dahn 17:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many quotes uttered by contemporaries of Boulanger help to illustrate what was thought of him, and while the inclusion of primary information is always desirable, it would be nice to know where the bulk of this information came from. The External Links section is probably very interesting reading for anyone who desires read about Boulanger, but neither I nor many people who may want to learn more speak or read French, which makes further enlightenment difficult. A simple bibliography would help to fix this problem concerning the sources used for this article.

First of all, you can't blame me or anyone in particular for further information not existing in English. The quotes where tranlsted from the French section. I know, the French have this stupid habit of considering quotes to not need mention of a source - if it helps, I personally have heard the Ferry and Clemenceau ones in numerous contexts. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Other notable things about this document include the need to clean up some of the grammar and wording used. In the Minister section parentheses are left open and some words, such as hastily, are misspelled.

Blame them mostly on me being myopic (and not a native English-speaker). Please, hunt my grammar down and improve it, by all means. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The most awkward sentence within the article is the third sentence under the Scandal heading, which comes at an inopportune time because it is Boulanger’s downfall that stands as one of the most interesting things about him.

It was in there before I started adding text. I simply took all info available and put it in one place: unfortunately, nothing seemed to make things clearer about the events themselves. I also dislike the speculative nature of it, but I thought someone with more knowledge might reformulate it (this is a major problem: I knew enough to know some things needed reformulation, but not enough to know what to formulate instead). Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned before, inclusion of English external links would also improve this encyclopedic entry.

I have found none whatsoever. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to know more about the duel that Boulanger lost to an elderly man, an occurrence that is shocking for an accomplished military man.

Me too, but the only reference to the outcome of the duel was in this article already, as far as I remember. Again, use inter-wiki: Floquet has an article, and it does say a bit more. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From what i remember, Boulanger said he had not fought with a sword since his army training. Thus, it had been 20/30 years since he had last wielded a sword. The duel was nearly called off because Boulanger kept clumsily charging his opponent, considered taboo. It is also rumoured that he wanted to carry on fighting despite having an inch-deep wound in his neck. 217.205.110.52 (talk) 20:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Knowing what exactly made Boulanger a weak orator would be beneficial as well, because it is unusual to see such an important public figure that struggles in communicating their ideas.

The mention seemed subjective to me, but I left in the article: I thought perhaps someone knows why, and could enlighten us. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Finally, a more extensive explanation or analysis of why Boulanger balked at the height of his influence in Paris would also be nice. The different ideas expressed by historians knowledgeable about the events would be a very nice inclusion. Overall, this is a very informative and impressive article about Georges Boulanger, although some minor improvements could be made to make it even more extraordinary. CRog 09:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the appreciation. I agree that a lot needs to be done on this article - but I think I have helped people who could do more for it: at the very least, because replacing and rephrasing in an existing text is easier than writing a new one. Dahn 15:01, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

This article appears to borrow some sentences directly from the Columbia Encyclopedia article on Boulanger[1], such as "Numerous royalists gave him financial aid, although Boulanger saw himself as a future dictator rather than a restorer of kings". Algabal 23:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

This is a B level article, but it is in serious need of sources. ludahai 魯大海 01:03, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coup & WP:NOTCRYSTAL

[edit]

There is part of a paragraph that reads:

A coup d'état seemed probable and desirable among his supporters. Boulanger had now become a threat to the parliamentary Republic. Had he immediately placed himself at the head of a revolt he might have effected the coup which many of his partisans had worked for, and might even have governed France; but the opportunity passed with his procrastination on January 27.
  • There are no citations for this
  • Which of his supporters said that a coup was probable and/or desirable?
  • The last sentence is speculation - and in its current form is in breach of Wikipedia policy WP:NOTCRYSTAL. It would be OK, if this was the opinion of someone important, and there was a reliable source for it

--Toddy1 (talk) 20:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gustave Flourens was dead in 1887

[edit]

The article states that Boulanger was engaged in a dispute with Gustave Flourens in 1887. Gustave Flourens died in 1871. Actarus000 (talk) 16:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article says that Boulanger was in a dispute with the foreign minister... Flourens. As the foreign minister at that time was Émile Flourens, I have changed the article to say Émile Flourens.--Toddy1 (talk) 08:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Georges Ernest Boulanger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Georges Ernest Boulanger by Atelier Nadar.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 30, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-30. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Ernest Boulanger

Georges Ernest Boulanger (29 April 1837 – 30 September 1891), nicknamed Général Revanche, was a French general and politician. An enormously popular public figure during the Third Republic, he won a series of elections and was feared to be powerful enough to establish himself as dictator at the zenith of his popularity in January 1889. This photograph of Boulanger was produced by the atelier of the French photographer Nadar.

Photograph credit: Atelier Nadar; restored by Adam Cuerden

Recently featured:

Very less citations

[edit]

Citations have been rarely used for this article and the section 'The rise of Boulangisme' has no citations. I am placing a template for this and hope that action is taken. WikiSilky (talk) 09:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Payne

[edit]

I removed the reference to Payne describing Boulanger as a proto-fascist as Payne plainly did not believe this. To quote from his 1995 A History of Fascism on page 44, "Though the League of Patriots and Boulangism incorporated some of the concepts of fascism, Boulangism was not a true fascist-type movement, and France was not suffering from a genuine “prefascist crisis” in the 1880s. It was too stable, prosperous, and successful to fall prey to such temptations." For Payne, fascism follows from economic crisis and he therefore rejects the possibility that Boulanger was a fascist. 69.143.85.153 (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Georges_Ernest_Boulanger&oldid=1245305803"