Jump to content

Talk:George Jones (RAAF officer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGeorge Jones (RAAF officer) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starGeorge Jones (RAAF officer) is part of the Command in the South West Pacific Area series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 26, 2013.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
September 8, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
January 7, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
December 23, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article


UFO enthusiast

[edit]

Good article. One thing though: Jones was a prominent UFO enthusiast, see Australian ufology and Air Marshall Sir George Jones and the UFO. I think this should be mentioned(?) Grant | Talk 14:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, fair enough, I remember seeing a couple of mentions of him in connection with UFOs on the web - especially that quote about being "loath to talk about it publicly lest people should think I was either an incompetent witness or getting a little screwy in the head". I'll work it in sometime soon. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose 15:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CB

[edit]

I was aware that my initial wording wasn't the best, but I was trying to make it seem less "tacked on" to the end of the para, and make it flow more ligically from teh preceding sentences. Perhaps "Regardless of this..." would do, or perhaps any such qualification is unecessary. I'm slightly curious as to why you felt it necessary to avoid the re-direct on King's Birthday Honours, but left the one on Companion of the Bath alone? Particularly since there will probably be a reasonable case for moving Queen's Birthday Honours to King's Birthday Honours on the (eventual) death of the current monarch, at which point the redirect will then run the other way. David Underdown (talk) 12:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mate, I see your point about it possibly looking a bit tacked on without something to make it flow from what went before, I knew that's what you were doing. I was thinking of just rewording slightly to say "Despite this issue..." but when I tried it without any preliminary, it didn't look too bad to me. It's not a huge deal, perhaps I'm being too careful... As for redirects, again you're right - the Order of the Bath link was an oversight, and for the Birthday Honours perhaps pragmatism is the way to go in future... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No worries (sorry, a year or so sitting next to a Queenslander when I first started work), I don't know if you're aware of WP:R2D, I went through a phase of piping redirected links, but now I normally follow the directions given there. If you don't think the bald mention of the CB is too bad, I'm happy to leave it at that. David Underdown (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To hyphenate or not to hyphenate?

[edit]

In the RAF the correct spelling for 2 star rank is "air vice-marshal" although "air vice marshal" is sometimes seen. What is the correct rendering in the RAAF? Greenshed (talk) 08:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much the same, actually, though it wasn't so obvious when this was first written five or six years ago -- tweaked accordingly, tks. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:54, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Director of Training

[edit]

Who followed Jones as Director of Training in 1942? According to Douglas Gillison in the Royal Australian Air Force, 1939-1942 (page 142) Air Commodore F N Wright was RAAF Director of Training from 1943. It would be good to complete the following succession box:

Military offices
Preceded by Director of Training
1940–1942 		Succeeded by
Unknown

Thanks. Greenshed (talk) 12:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice yes, but I have to admit it's not that high a priority to me. I'm a little dubious about succession boxes in general unless there are reliable sources actually listing the incumbents of a position. I'm aware of such lists for CAS/CAF, squadron COs, Air Members for Personnel, etc, but I don't know of one for this position. Trying to piece succession together from disparate sources, which might only mention the year someone began and ended their tenure, runs the risk of missing out incumbents who served a short time (less than a calendar year, at any rate) in a role. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that it is safe to say that I am rather keener on succession boxes than you are - partly because when I have been researching other historical topics for off-wiki purposes the succession boxes can be a very useful quick reference to who was doing what at one point. I also would observe that this article is on the Front Page (congratulations) and so filling in the succession details for Jones's second most senior appointment, held during a world war, seems like a rather higher priority than many other succession questions. I do take your point about running the risk of missing out incumbents and of course having the month or better still the day is a considerable help. Another trick I have used is that a crafted search can be made once the likely two parties to a handover are known as often some note is published in a specialist periodical which actually mentions the handover. Greenshed (talk) 13:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For example, here is the reference that Jones replaced Scherger: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/40860490 Greenshed (talk) 18:23, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, fair point, I have found Trove a very useful source for handovers as well. I generally make a search there as part of my article work these days -- it just wasn't around (or I didn't know about it) when I first put this particular article together in 2007 (I have added information from various sources to this article since then but not Trove, since it was fairly well detailed anyway). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly succeeded by Frederick Scherger although given that Scherger was getting shuffled through a series of appointments there may have been someone else who briefly served as Director of Training in between Jones and Scherger. Greenshed (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See Australia in the War of 1939-1945, Australian War Memorial, 1963, p. 460 footnotes. Greenshed (talk) 23:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on George Jones (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on George Jones (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on George Jones (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Jones (RAAF officer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

URFA/2020 check

[edit]

IAW WP:URFA/2020 I checked this older FA, did a very light c/e, and found it in entirely satisfactory condition for a FA. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peacemaker67 and Ian Rose:, I made some minor adjustments; feel free to revert anything I mess up. I find it odd that we don't have an article on aviation kills ... that is a jargon term understood to military and aviation personnel, but not necessarily everyone else, and it seems like an article could be justified, as it could then explain how a kill is documented, when there is controversy about number of kills. I checked Ace (military) and see we don't really get into it there either. That search also led me to Flying ace, where I got a MOS:SANDWICH headache. Anyway, just wondering you all think a definition of a "kill" might be written somewhere on Wikipedia. (No need to get back to me, unwatching, marking Satisfactory.) Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Jones_(RAAF_officer)&oldid=1216288476"