Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/George Jones (RAAF officer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Self-nom for this B-class article that's recently undergone peer review, during which I believe I addressed all points raised. Like to think it has the potential to go to FA but let's see what comes out of the next stage. Cheers, Ian Rose 13:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Good job. Cla68 15:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. I was a peer reviewer of the article and all requests have been acted on. It looks good. Woodym555 15:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support A very good article. --Nick Dowling 00:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
on conditionthat citation number 38 is changed, Wikipedia can not be cited as source in an article.TomStar81 (Talk) 06:48, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Modified. While the intent was simply a footnote in order to avoid cluttering the relevant paragraph, with a wikilink for more info, I see how it might be interpreted as WP citing itself. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose 11:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- To be fair, I've done that myself; however, most articles that pass through here are bound for the FAC page, and the FAC contributers will single out cites of that nature for the same reason I did, so you may as well correct it now before answering to a board of higher athority :) TomStar81 (Talk) 22:33, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Modified. While the intent was simply a footnote in order to avoid cluttering the relevant paragraph, with a wikilink for more info, I see how it might be interpreted as WP citing itself. Thanks/cheers, Ian Rose 11:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.