Talk:George Headley/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: KnowIG (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC) Fantastic article. You can link things more I think.[reply]

First time you mention Jamacia as a cricket team link you haven't done so.

Linked in lead.--Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link some of the other cricket teams.

Done as many as I could see, there may be others but main ones done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also Middlesex county is that the county side from GB if so link.

It isn't; there is no article to link to. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Link first class.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

a West Indian batsman against an English team. Link to England the country.

Don't think this is necessary. Linking this would be overlinking as everyone who reads this will know what England is, and the Test team would not be an appropriate link here.

West Indies tour of England link teams. Test series link.

Linked the tour, not sure what you mean by Test series link. If you mean link the Test series article, I don't think they exist. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Summeries. Link your terms, teams and countries but it's not going to stop me from passing it.

All done I think. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another minor but annoying thing apparently you need &nb sp; instead of a space in between number and measurement.

Not sure where you mean here. I don't think there are any measurements in the article, and MOSNUM says only use nbsp before a SI symbol. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and under the 1934 England series link to this article please English cricket team in West Indies in 1934–35 and 1933 series West Indian cricket team in England in 1933 and for any other tour you can find.

Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's about it. I'll let you impliment the little changes before I pass KnowIG (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I've split it up into seperate lines to reply. I've covered everything, I think. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good I'm passing. And also good luck with the FAC is assume you'll take it to that KnowIG (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]