Jump to content

Talk:George Headley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleGeorge Headley is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 30, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
April 5, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
May 6, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:George Headley/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: KnowIG (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC) Fantastic article. You can link things more I think.[reply]

  • First time you mention Jamacia as a cricket team link you haven't done so.
Linked in lead.--Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link some of the other cricket teams.
Done as many as I could see, there may be others but main ones done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also Middlesex county is that the county side from GB if so link.
It isn't; there is no article to link to. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link first class.
Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • a West Indian batsman against an English team. Link to England the country.
Don't think this is necessary. Linking this would be overlinking as everyone who reads this will know what England is, and the Test team would not be an appropriate link here.
  • West Indies tour of England link teams. Test series link.
Linked the tour, not sure what you mean by Test series link. If you mean link the Test series article, I don't think they exist. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Summeries. Link your terms, teams and countries but it's not going to stop me from passing it.
All done I think. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another minor but annoying thing apparently you need &nb sp; instead of a space in between number and measurement.
Not sure where you mean here. I don't think there are any measurements in the article, and MOSNUM says only use nbsp before a SI symbol. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's about it. I'll let you impliment the little changes before I pass KnowIG (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, I've split it up into seperate lines to reply. I've covered everything, I think. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good I'm passing. And also good luck with the FAC is assume you'll take it to that KnowIG (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Worth mentioning?

[edit]
  • In 1998, Haslingden chose him as the best player of the club's history, as part of the 'Beyond the Boundary' exhibition on the Lancashire League.[1]
  • Politician, former Jamaica captain and member of the West Indies Cricket Board of Control Noel Nethersole was instrumental in getting Headley appointed as captain of the West Indies team.[2]
  1. ^ Frith, Bob. "Lancs League: Beyond the Boundary exhibition". ESPNCricinfo. Retrieved 16 January 2011.
  2. ^ Manley, pp. 70–71.

OrangeKnight (talk) 18:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first one is definitely worth a mention, and I stuck it in. Not as sure about the second one. It seems that each club just chose one player; it is not clear who chose or how much thought went into it. As it does not say which other players played for Haslingden, I'm not sure it's that great an accolade if the next best player was Joe Bloggs of Blankshire! Also, it does not seem quite as prestigious as the other "awards" he received. However, feel free to argue! --Sarastro1 (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue, I think you're right. They perhaps just chose the most famous player to have played for them and, as you rightly said, it's not as prestigious as other accolades he received. I thought about these facts while (partially) reading this article because I remembered them. In the same vein, to mark the 75th anniversary of the first Test cricket match played by the West Indies, Headley was voted as one of the five best Jamaican players of all time and then selected by a panel that included Richie Benaud and CMJ as one of the five best players in the West Indies' Test history.[1][2]
  1. ^ Wisden Cricinfo staff. "Who are the greatest West Indians of them all?". ESPNCricinfo. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
  2. ^ Wisden Cricinfo staff. "Five greats of West Indies cricket honoured". ESPNCricinfo. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
OrangeKnight (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly, added the West Indian part but left out the Jamaican part. It's a bit shoe-horned in, but I think it works. We'll find out soon, as it's currently at FAC! --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Some other facts, but it could be over-detailing to mention that: until Phillip Hughes scored centuries in both innings of a Test cricket match against South Africa some 79 years later, GH was the youngest player to do so![1] What about the "White Headley" nickname of Bradman? (even more over-detailing, maybe). Something that could highlight why the emergence of a world-class Black batsman in the West Indies is so crucial is the fact that West Indies cricket inherited from a situation where good batsmen where generally white and good bowlers generally black because, in the plantations, at the end of the 19th century, white owners batted while black employees bowled at them. OrangeKnight (talk) 20:54, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Coverdale, Bryan. "Australia have their 'Phil', and how". ESPNCricinfo. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
I agree Hughes info may be over-detailing. I'm not sure about the "White Headley" as I've never seen anything to indicate that this was contemporary (unless I'm overlooking something obvious) rather than a later writer trying to be clever. I'm more interested in who called him the "Black Bradman" and when. I think the question of why WI batsmen were white is probably beyond the scope of this article, which is already quite dense. Your reasons are spot on, but I might add other ones such as the "supression" of black batsmen in favour of white ones, as there are several early black batsmen who never gained recognition but were pretty good. But I don't think we could fit this in here. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for all your replies. OrangeKnight (talk) 17:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on George Headley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Headley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Double immortal at which cricket ground in England

[edit]

George headley 67.230.62.229 (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_Headley&oldid=1221191018"