Talk:George A. Keyworth II

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Science Policy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hewlett-Packard#HP pretexting scandal|scandal]] The anchor (#HP pretexting scandal) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

HP Board link

I removed to link to HP's board of directors[1] since there is nothing about him there. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifics of News Leak

It seems like this article would be a lot stronger if we could get the specific details of the news leaks (following best practices of siting sources, of course). BryanJacobson 17:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Unadulterated lies quote

Was completely taken out of context - Keyworth said that 3rd generation nukes were all lies, but wasn't as clear about the rest. The London Review of Books article isn't even about SDI, it's on the use of science, so it's a bad quote. This article could use a better explanation as to his change of heart on SDI, but by using real quotes. [LRB article http://www.lrb.co.uk/v23/n20/shap01_.html] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Benwetmore (talk • contribs) 03:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External link?

Would an interview with transcript with George Keyworth from 1987 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_601DFAB79E9442CDB7F8C99A331D793C (I have a conflict of interest; otherwise I would add it myself.) Mccallucc (talk) 16:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George A. Keyworth, II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19970104104533/http://www.navy.mil/ to http://www.library.georgetown.edu/digital/krogh

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]