Talk:Geographer

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Occupations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations articles

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 4 October 2021 for a period of one week.

Comments

Um,I'm confused. What does 'location problems' mean? Environmental problems we all can understand, but no one really knows what 'location problems' means. Over population? Pollution? Let's fix that.

You need to add something about Chasing Vermmer on this page. Some people need to look that up and they can not find it under anything. So they come here and they do not find anything about the book Chasing Vermeer. So I would suggest that you add something about Chasing Vermeer.

Painting

Discussion of the painting absolutely does not belong here. If it's notable, it should have its own page, with a disambiguation redirect on this one. —Kerfuffler 00:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Geographer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100207230321/http://www.nationalgeographic.com/education/themes.html to http://www.nationalgeographic.com/education/themes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of geographers

I don't believe that the list of notable geographers belongs here. At the very least, there should not be such detailed descriptions of the geographers. Also, the information on the painting seems out of place. Sehtnaryhpez (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the list and have removed it. As I said in my edit summary, a separate article might be worth considering, especially if there's a similar good article. It would need consensus for an inclusion criteria that is neutral, and each entry should summarize the existing article on the subject rather than being written from poor sources. If there are no similar GA articles, then it might be best to scrap the idea completely. The POV and OR problems that arise from attempting such a list, especially a list with substantial summaries of each entry, seem overwhelming. --Ronz (talk) 18:42, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Organizations

Should I add notable geographer organizations here? Is this not the right place to add it here. SVcode(Talk) 00:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]