Talk:Gentiloni government

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is Poletti a Democrat?

Both here and in Renzi Cabinet minister Giuliano Poletti is referred as an independent. However, he has long been politically active: he was long a member of the PCI/PDS and, most recently, he has been spoken at the national assembly of the PD. Is he a Democrat, then? --Checco (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is one itwiki user who usually knows this type of stuff, Caarl 95. --Alexmar983 (talk) 07:20, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I ping him. I am not an expert, I have always considered him a member of PD. But I guess if he were formally enrolled in any party, they would probably had advised him to keep it quite many times, considering his quotes from last months :D --Alexmar983 (talk) 07:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about Caarl 95, but good! I ping also User:Nick.mon, our en.Wiki expert. --Checco (talk) 09:44, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sincerly, I'm not sure about his membership. Of course, for example, Poletti is different from Padoan, another centre-left independent which is ideologically close to PD, but absolutely not a member of the party. Poletti was the leader of LegaCoop, the main cooperative federation active in Italy, which is close to the Democratic Party; moreover as Checco said he was a member of PCI and PDS, and probably he's a member of the PD, (in fact he spoke to the National Assembly), but unfortunately I have no sources to prove that. -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, I saw that in it.wiki Poletti is now considered a member of the PD, but without any source. -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what do you suggest to do? --Checco (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In my personal view, we can consider him a member of the PD, anyway we can wait for Caarl 95, hoping he has more informations about Poletti -- Nick.mon (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Alexmar For the "expert", but I'm not an expert at all; I'm sure that Checco and Nick.mom know very much more than me. Anyway, I, too, am not sure about Poletti's membership. I'm editing by phone now, when I'll arrive at home I'll try to search for some sources. Anyway I agree with Nick.mom when he says that we could consider Poletti a PD member.--Caarl⁹⁵ 15:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caarl 95 (talk • contribs)

...and what about Calenda?

In February 2015 minister Calenda was reported joining the PD (see article from Corriere della Sera), but after that he has been considered an independent by news sources. How should we consider him in this article and in Renzi Cabinet? --Checco (talk) 08:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In it.Wiki they say that Calenda expressed his intention to join the PD after the de facto end of Civic Choice, but then he didn't. So I think that we can consider him an independent. And what have we decided about Poletti? -- Nick.mon (talk) 08:15, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It.Wiki can't be a source, but it is true that Calenda is generally considered an independent by the media; additionally, the media, Renzi on TV and (indirectly) Casini this morning on the Corriere della Sera have talked about Calenda as a possible leader of the centre-right or as the "Italian Macron". I would probably list him as an independent since his appointment as minister of Economic Development, while listing him as a Democrat after the break-up of SC. On Poletti, my idea is to consider him as a Democrat only in this cabinet and not in Renzi's government. --Checco (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I agree, we can consider Calenda an independent (in fact he's always listed as a "technocratic minister"^[1]) and consider Poletti a Democrat only in this cabinet. -- Nick.mon (talk) 09:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Calenda is an independent, I agree. About Poletti, living in China I can't use google so I can't get decent sources on such a specific aspect. In the end, I think that he is so close to the "PD world" that for the vast majority of Italians there's no real difference if he is or is not formally enrolled.--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We are lucky: a few days ago Calenda declared that he is not and has never been a member of the PD.^[2] --Checco (talk) 15:10, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Renzi e i ministri "tecnici", lo scontro è continuo: in autunno resa dei conti
^ Otto e Mezzo, link to video, starting from minute 17:36

References

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Paolo Gentiloni 2019 Official.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:01, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Meloni Cabinet which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Renzi e i ministri "tecnici", lo scontro è continuo: in autunno resa dei conti

[2] Otto e Mezzo, link to video, starting from minute 17:36

[1]

[2]