Talk:Genre studies

Writing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Genre#Genre as social action|social action]] The anchor (#Genre as social action) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Genre#Genre as social action|new genre idea]] The anchor (#Genre as social action) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Old comments

-- I feel strongly that this article reads too much like an essay advancing various points of contention within the genre studies movement, rather than describing the topic itself from outside the subject. I'm tagging it. --75.168.235.205 (talk) 06:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a limited representation of genre studies; there also exists rhetorical genre studies in linguistics that should either be added to this document or linked from this document. Msanford 22:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm just a visitor...don't really know how to do things...but I was noticing that this page does not link to "genre criticism," which 
    covers the stuff I was actually looking for when I first arrived at the "genre studies" entry (Bakhtin, Carolyn Miller, etc.). Can  
    someone link it up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.134.200 (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linked-up Msanford (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this article makes out that genre studies take a historical turn as a result of Derrida's and then Cohen's papers (respectively 1980; 1986). Reception discourse on 'horizons of expectations' (applicable to, but not limited to, genre) in their synchronic and diachronic aspects date back at least to HR Jauss's seminal 'Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory', trans. in NLH vol.2 no.1 (Autumn 1970). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.14.199 (talk) 03:05, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added the reference to Jauss and link to Horizons of Expectation page, but link is not working?Kkaczmarek (talk) 03:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Looks like a lot of original research on this page. It's well written, but probably should be moved to a different site. 69.2.58.161 (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Structuralism and Genre

This article incorrectly states that the study of genre is inherently structuralist. Clearly, it's not, since the ancient Greeks were doing it. DionysosProteus (talk) 16:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article states not that genre studies is inherently structuralist, but that it is structuralist. The fact that ancient Greeks were doing it does not invalidate this claim. Furthermore, the article goes on to state that "Genre theory or genre studies got underway with the Greeks", so any reader in any way familiar with structuralism as a movement will not be misled. Finally, the online Oxford English Dictionary defines structuralism as "Any theory or method in which a discipline or field of study is envisaged as comprising elements interrelated in systems and structures at various levels, the structures and the interrelations of their elements being regarded as more significant than the elements considered in isolation; also, more recently, theories concerned with analysing the surface structures of a system in terms of its underlying structure." Study of genre fits this description perfectly; even the genre studies carried out by the Ancient Greeks. Oneillj4 (talk) 00:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mediocre article

Wittgenstein engaged in "deconstruction"? "dictionary.com" as an authority on the definition of genre? Can someone competent please rewrite this article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.192.235.213 (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably should be removed

This article is inconsistent. Genre studies in literature is only tangentially related to genre theory in sociolinguistics and literacy theory. I agree with much of what others say. Eventually, I'll write something on Genre Theory, but this is a mess. mnewmanqc (talk) 21:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genre studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150509013303/http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/intgenre/intgenre.html to http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/intgenre/intgenre.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Genre studies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160504022356/http://www.metadiscourseacrossgenres.com/ to https://metadiscourseacrossgenres.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]