Talk:Gengoroh Tagame/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 18:41, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey I will be reviewing this article. Review will be soon. Link20XX (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Morgan695: I have completed my initial review. Great job overall, just a few things needed before it can be promoted.
Checklist:
[edit]Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments:
[edit]- In the second paragraph of Themes and Motifs, link the article for the word "pejorative", as I doubt most English speakers know what it means.
- The link for source 3 doesn't appear to work, you may need to get the archive link.
- Optional, but it may be a good idea to replace ’ with '.
That is it. Address each mandatory issue and I will promote it. Link20XX (talk) 02:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Link20XX: Both mandatory issues have been resolved. Morgan695 (talk) 03:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Morgan695: The changes resolved both issues. The result of this review is Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)