Jump to content

Talk:Generalmusic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Elka

[edit]

The article says they produce two series, GEM and LEM. But they also produce under the brand name ELKA. So it's three series... Kricke 02:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


decent sized article about crumar, briefly mentions that the same family (a brother, I believe, of mario crucianelli) founded elka, & yet when you get here.... nada. just a stubby load of duff gen about GEM. well. this needs fixing somehow.

198.147.19.2 (talk) 18:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LEM GEM difference fault

[edit]

Article says that LEM is the professional series and GEM is the standart series. I disagree; S2, S3, Genesys, SK series, Promega series are all produced under name GEM. These instruments are completely professional. Ghanedan 20:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now it says "various studio equipment series called LEM". I had a LEM bass amplifier which was definately not studio equipent. So the article is still wrong. Kricke (talk) 20:29, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Altough I can easily accept an amplifier as a studio equipment, a firmer definition would be appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.174.232.58 (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

about the single sided article

[edit]

Hi, I have described Generalmusic from my personal experience on their synthesizers and arrenger workstations. I think the article needs a bit more on their digital pianos (promega series) and classical pianos. Ghanedan 18:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC) Guney Hanedan[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

I strongly believe the semi-protection vandalism must be raised again, after it was automatically removed by DumbBOT. Also, the version should be reverted to Ironhold's revision cause the user from 80.180.164.205 added advertisement. Ingleopard (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bankruptcy

[edit]

I've been reviewing the edits for this page. Everyone I've corresponded with, including the guy who administers www.generalmusic-service.de, says that Generalmusic are indeed bankrupt. If you go to the aforementioned site, the first thing you'll see is a message saying exactly that. I've been trying to find accessories for my piano. They're simply not available. The US forum is unavailable. Support from www.generalmusic.com is unavailable. I've emailed them and I've got nothing. If there is indeed no-one checking these messages currently, then maybe in future, when and if someone actually does read my e-mail, they might consider informing their loyal customers of the current situation, as opposed to just pretending that everything's okay when it so obviously isn't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.156.15 (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We cannot add speculation to the article. We must have a source to declare that they are bankrupt. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
News articles from May 2013 clearly state that General Music is in bancruptcy. The actual news was that a Finnish company "Soundion" has bought the brand name, IPR and apparently some of the production facilities/hardware and is planning to ramp up production of electronical instruments. There's not much information about that however. Articles in Finnish and Swedish:
http://www.ts.fi/uutiset/talous/488925/Sahkopianot+saapuvat+Saloon
http://svenska.yle.fi/artikel/2013/05/23/ts-italiensk-pianofabrik-flyttar-till-salo109.204.158.245 (talk) 19:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Generalmusic. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]