Jump to content

Talk:General-purpose heat source

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GPHSs are designed with safety in mind and employ Plutonium-238 pellets encased in iridium

[edit]

Sounds real safe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.210.238.74 (talk) 01:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They're radioactive heat sources, no shit. Considering that, the design is quite safe. 141.83.115.10 (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

[edit]

It would appear that there is a great deal of overlap in the articles General Purpose Heat Source and GPHS-RTG, the former discussing the general concept and the later and example of its use. It would seem natural to me for these to be discussed together, especially given lack of information on either. ChiZeroOne (talk) 16:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose this, because the GPHS, as the name imply, is used not only in the GPHS-RTG, but also in the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator and the Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator. Bomazi (talk) 19:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General-purpose heat source. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]