Talk:Gender representation on corporate boards of directors

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Women in Business Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Scowch. Peer reviewers: Cmhofley, Jbarczak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting rewrite

I will be rewriting and expanding this page and propose making the following revisions:

expanding the ‘Equality of Treatment’ section and inserting any required citations;
updating the citations in the ‘Current Landscape’ section. The current citations are mostly out of date and have been sourced from documents from the period 2011 – 2013;
extending the 'Current Landscape' section to include countries in Asia, North Africa and the Middle East to provide a worldwide view on the subject;
amending the heading 'Glass ceiling' to 'Challenges to achieving gender diversity on corporate boards;
expanding the ‘Regulatory Responses’ section by including data from more countries and outlining both sides of the debate on establishing quotas for women representation on boards. I will also rename this section 'Encouraging gender diversity on corporate boards', with the subheading of 'Regulatory responses' and '

In addition, I will be inserting the following new sections:

a short section on the history of women on boards;
'Effects of gender diversity on corporate boards' which will consist of a discussion on the empirical studies that have been undertaken on this issue. I will include a discussion of studies that have found a positive correlation between gender diversity and firm value and findings that have not; and
the gender pay gap on corporate boards; and
gender representation of CEOs.

Please let me know if you have any suggestions on improving this article. A detailed list of the references I propose to consult can be found on my user page. Scowch (talk) 20:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on the Improvements

Hi Scowch,

I really like your edits to this page. I have a few comments on how it may be improved moving forward. For one, I think it would be great to include more information on the causations of gender disparity on boards of directors. You do a great job surveying the significance of gender disparities to corporate success, but the state of educated women capable of serving, but denied a position, could be fleshed out more to give some context to how the problem can be solved (maybe at its source?) I would also tie the equality of treatment relevancy into the beginning in a more fleshed out manner. I did not know its relevance until the end of the article, and then realized its importance to the topic. Finally, it may be helpful to either add more details about country differences in BOD composition, or to deal with less countries but in a more significant way. Right now it appears more like a more randomized list and less like a representation of an international perspective, but seems like the countries included deal with problem in interesting ways that could also be talked about in terms of what outcomes (socially, economically) were achieved as a result.

Love your work so far--so many citations! Cmhofley (talk) 20:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Article: Some Recommendations

Great job on your article! The article gives a great overview of the subject matter! There are a couple things that I think could improve the overall effect of your Wikipedia article. First, it would be helpful to expand the section on the effects of gender diversity on corporate boards as well as the section on female CEOs. Currently, each of these sections is relatively short and broad. The article would be even better if you could provide some more detailed information regarding these subsections. Second, the article could be improved by adding more links to the article and adding links to this article on other, related Wikipedia articles. Some related articles that would be good to link include: gender pay gap, gender diversity, board of directors, and glass ceiling. Finally, be careful to specifically attribute view points and research findings to specific authors. Several times throughout the article you reference "some studies." The article would be improved if you identified specific studies and authors. Overall great work! Jbarczak (talk) 22:35, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Katharine Graham.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Katharine Graham.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:37, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Russell 1000/Fortune 1000

In the first paragraph it had said that as of 2018 percentage of women on the boards of Fortune 1000 companies was 21.3%. However the source given for this statistic actually said that this number was 22%. The 21.3% figure was relating to Russell 1000 companies. I have changed the sentence accordingly, so that 'fortune 1000' has been replaced with 'russell 1000'. --51.9.0.254 (talk) 18:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Gender power gap into Gender representation on corporate boards of directors

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, due to the different scope of the articles and the size/importance of the topics; expand. Klbrain (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are just two names for the same concept. Cambalachero (talk) 19:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cambalachero: disagree. Gender power gap has a large section on political representation gap (which has nothing to do with boards of directors), and, with regards to corporate representation, it goes beyond board presence and covers stock ownsership. Rkieferbaum (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The gender power gap and gender representation on corporate boards are two different, albeit similar, concepts. Aydoh8 (talk) 04:43, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. The power gap article seems ready to expand on the concept of power in the political arena as well. MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.