Talk:Gender inequality
This is the talk page for discussing Gender inequality and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-12-05. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Msfssp4 (talk · contribs) on 4 May 2021 with the comment: Obviously biased. It was contested by Firefangledfeathers (talk · contribs) on 11:21, 4 May 2021 with the comment: Process should not be used on articles that have previously been discussed for deletion. Also, I disagree with the nom reason and believe any issues this article has to be fixable |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2022 and 13 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jzaragoza23 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: C.ler2022.
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Add information
[edit]I suggest adding a section on education:
Wiki Education assignment: Race in America, sec 2
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lovebug416 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Lovebug416 (talk) 17:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Merge proposal into Sexism
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- There is some difference, for further discussion but not merging at this point. HudecEmil (talk) 08:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Same meaning: one is currently described as "prejudice or discrimination based on one's sex or gender", other is described as "social phenomenon in which people are not treated equally on the basis of gender". Considering everything here is social phenomenon: it's the same, proposing to merge. HudecEmil (talk) 16:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a subtle difference here: Sexism is prejudice or discrimination, and gender inequality is a manifestation of sexism. Alone these two are almost the same, but one can be sexist but not "gender inequality-ist". Not all gender inequality is caused by sexism. Some is caused by gender roles, which is not immediately sexism (but can be), such as women having children and not going to work, causing a gender inequality of income. —Panamitsu (talk) 23:36, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Manifestation is vague. Do you have a reference for this?
- I seems to me the two terms have a history of equivalence in popular usage and older parts of literature. Though, this aspect could be added to the article without merging them. HudecEmil (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- They are quite similar indeed. The lead of this article reads
This inequality can be caused by gender discrimination or sexism.
📊Panamitsu (talk) 22:10, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- They are quite similar indeed. The lead of this article reads
- Oppose Basically reluctant to support any hurried action.
- What I would suggest rather than continuing merge notice sans discussion invitations to WP women projects boards open a article scope discussion with more participants from WP women projects.
- HudecEmil and Panamitsu can present their ideal drafts for community consideration in such discussion the better, I suggest. Bookku (talk) 05:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Wiki-link added
[edit]Hi! I made a minor edit, I added a wiki-link to the Gender Inequality Index (GII). Roxytilly333 (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Add A Fact: "Adolescent girls spend more time on chores"
[edit]I found a fact that might belong in this article. See the quote below
Worldwide, adolescent girls aged 10-14 are twice as likely to spend excessive hours (at least 21 per week) on household chores than boys of the same age. Globally, twenty-two per cent of adolescent girls aged 15-19 are not in education, employment or training (NEET) compared to thirteen per cent of boys of the same age.
The fact comes from the following source:
Additional comments from user: Girls are still disadvantaged in access to education.
This post was generated using the Add A Fact browser extension.
- B-Class Feminism articles
- High-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Gender studies articles
- High-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles