Talk:Gen-Z (consortium)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
On 15 September 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Gen-Z to Gen-Z (consortium). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 15 September 2021
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved, with Gen-Z redirecting to Generation Z and a hatnote at that article. The possibility of making Gen-Z a disambiguation page instead would probably best be resolved in a separate discussion. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Gen-Z → Gen-Z (consortium) – The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "Gen-Z" is Generation Z. Gen Z already redirects there. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Def not the primary topic—blindlynx (talk) 03:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, and redirect Gen-Z to Generation Z. The consortium should be noted in the header at Generation Z as well.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. I agree that this is not the primary topic. Aoba47 (talk) 02:22, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, but maybe there should be a disambiguation page at the hyphenated basename of "Gen-Z", since that spelling could be ambiguous whether the generation or the consortium is meant. Paintspot Infez (talk)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.