This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
As per BLP, a biography of a living person on Wikipedia should follow the NPOV. The old contraversies were properly kept in the contraversies section, particularly with reference to the FTC issue, and should be removed from the lead page. It's a request.Pkap1100 (talk) 04:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
To the contrary, per WP:CSECTION, the practice now on Wikipedia is to avoid 'controversies' sections entirely, and instead to incorporate content on any controversy into the relevant parts of an article. And given that a significant proportion of legitimate coverage of Srinubabu revolves around issues concerning the journals, the subsequent 50 million dollar fine etc, it would be a gross violation of WP:NPOV policy not to discuss this in the lede at all.
The article as it stands is still in need of improvement, if it is to follow best practice for biographies. This would no doubt have been easier were it not for the relentless puffery, sockpuppetry and attempted whitewashing that has blighted it so far. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
