This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
@MagicatthemovieS: I just wanted to ping you to let you know that you should not just delete the entire "Miscellaneous" subsection and then put it up for GAN (especially since you have not made much contributions to the actual article). The subsection needed to stay and reworked with sourcing and copyediting. I would revert your edits and remove this from GAN, and either work on that subsection yourself or leave it for someone else. Aside from that the "Broadway musical" subsection needs major work/revisions/sourcing. I have noticed you have removed sections from Ursula as well. Just notifying @Changedforbetter: as this user was a primary contributor to the page and may be interested in seeing your edits here. Aoba47 (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47: Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I agree with all of your concerns regarding the editor's edits and premature GA nomination for both this article and Ursula. I suggest that we give the editor some time to respond and see if he/she would be willing to put off the nomination and restore the miscellaneous section. If not, we might have to take this go ahead and revert the edit, and also see about the proper way of getting an article un-nominated when we have not nominated it ourselves.--Changedforbetter (talk) 04:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree. This is the only article that was nominated for GAN, but a similar edit was done on the Ursula page. Thank you for your response, and hopefully, everything goes smoothly. I will also wait for the user's response. Aoba47 (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
