Talk:Gary Miller (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Conservatism

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

California Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Real estate controversies

The "Real estate controversies" section has experienced a series of deletions by an unlogged-in editor at IP address 208.100.196.{193, 218, 229}. He hasn't left any clue as to his objections (he always leaves the edit summary blank) and I can't infer his goals by looking at his other edits since the only edits ever from these IP addresses have been these deletions. The section appears to be adequately sourced, but perhaps the tone of the section is too partisan? I'm quite new at editing Wikipedia, does anyone have any advice? --RP88 02:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and before I forget, to the editor at 208.100.196.{193,218,229}, please join this discussion. --RP88 02:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My advice is to treat (a) anonymous IP edits which (b) simply delete text (c) without any explanation (any edit summary) and (d) come from an account used only for that deletion, as vandalism.

Having said that, it never hurts to do a quick review of the text for the more obvious problems. I've done so, and removed one phrase. But, in general, you're not required either to be a mind-reader or to extensively research a section just because one person (presumably very partisan) wants to suppress part of an article. There are a lot better uses of your time. John Broughton | Talk 03:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks John, I appreciate the advice. --RP88 08:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political Positions Section

This section has very clearly been vandalized, and the first few paragraphs are rife with stilted language and accusations. However, the section does contain information that could be presented in a more facially-neutral way, and it might serve the page best to clean up rather than delete the section in its entirety. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.63.73 (talk) 20:45, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with Gary Miller or his political positions, but you're right, that section has obviously been the victim of unreverted vandalism. I went back into the page history and restored that section and the infobox to the state they were in before the recent spate of vandalism. Here is a link showing the changes resulting from my restoration if you want to review it for accuracy. —RP88 ^(talk) 21:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Military service

There is no attribution for the statement in the lede graf that Miller "dishonorably served United States Army. "Dishonorably served" is not even a phrase in use to describe military service, let alone a phrase that helps a reader understand what the author is talking about. Near the end of the entry is an odd, boxed and over-the-margin line about his inflating his military record - but again, there's no source. I know enough about Miller to know he's probably as bad a guy as the Wikipedia article makes him out to be, but in such cases it's even more important to substantiate what's written about him.Wlegro (talk) 17:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I attached a citation to the military service section, but I still can't figure out why it's formatted that strange way - a broken-line box with one sentence extending far past the margin.Wlegro (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think removing the "dishonorably" stuff is fine, I don't think labeling his military service as such is backed up by the current reference (although if someone has a reliable source that says he was dishonorably discharged, they should feel free to use it). I've also fixed the formatting problem with the military service section and put inline citations to the harpers reference in the infobox and lead section, —RP88 ^(talk) 17:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! YOU were the editing conflict! I thought I was conflicting with myself and had thereby somehow fixed the formatting. I was going to go back and take out the "dishonorably" part and found it was already gone, which clued me in someone was in at the moment I was editing. This got very confusing - first I saw my inline citation (No. 12) and then it was gone and replaced by No. 1 - confusion made worse by my not noticing right away that there was an editing conflict going on. Thanks for fixing. I looked for code to define the formatting error but found nothing but the usual equal-marks.Wlegro (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The formating problem was caused by a leading space, which is intended to be used for for formatting as a monospaced block of text, e.g:

this is
an example

—RP88 ^(talk) 18:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gary Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100511065819/http://www.myfoxla.com:80/dpp/news/local/congressman-under-fire-over-earmarks-20100506 to http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/news/local/congressman-under-fire-over-earmarks-20100506

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gary Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gary Miller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:12, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]