Talk:Garachi
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If they are Dom they are not Romani
[edit]The Domari left India at a completely different time period to that of the later leaving Romani. The two different groups speak different languages to one another from different regions and time periods. Domari speak a much earlier language that lacks the major Rajasthani and Panjabi influences.
They are therefore not Romani people but are Domari. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.227.166 (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
the article appears to claim that there is a group of Romani Garachi, distinct from the Dom Garachi. I find this dubious, and insufficiently referenced. The Dom people are often inaccurately subsumed under "Roma", so that simply providing a quote calling them "Roma" would be insufficient. We need a source explicitly confirming that there are two groups. --dab (𒁳) 09:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Garachi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215455/http://www.echo-az.com/archive/2006_12/1481/obshestvo06.shtml to http://www.echo-az.com/archive/2006_12/1481/obshestvo06.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)