Talk:Garðar Thór Cortes

Garðar Thór Cortes was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 6, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 28, 2007.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Icelandic tenor Garðar Thór Cortes was voted sexiest man in Iceland twice in one year in separate polls?

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Iceland Mid‑importance

	Iceland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iceland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iceland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IcelandWikipedia:WikiProject IcelandTemplate:WikiProject IcelandIceland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opera Start‑class

	Opera portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Archives

1

Position on classical charts?

Is there some website that says how well an album or single has done in the UK classical music chart(s)? Cheers, Jacklee 03:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Respelled pronunciation of "Garðar Thór Cortes"

Actually, I think the article "Garðar Thór Cortes" is one where a respelled pronunciation would come in very useful. Can we consider restoring it? Not many people read IPA symbols with ease, particularly those representing Icelandic phonology, and on my browser the character that you inserted after the "r" in "Cortes" doesn't even display properly – it appears as a little square. (What character is it supposed to be?) Also, I'm not sure it's right to consider the respelling system I used as "idiosyncratic" as I was applying the system set out in the "Help:Pronunciation respelling key" article. Cheers, Jacklee 01:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears as a little box to me too. I'm hoping that it displays somewhere as an unvoicing of the r. Can you explain to me the pronunciation information you want to add? What I removed was unintelligible to me. Haukur 01:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article "Help:Pronunciation respelling key" tries to set out a standard method for rendering pronunciations using letters of the English alphabet which should be easily understandable by most English speakers who are unfamiliar with the IPA. Have a look at that article. As regards the respelling (kar'-dhar tho~oor khorr'-tes), I actually thought it was fairly clear. Two things to note: stresses are marked after the syllable, not before (this is explained in the "Pronunciation respelling key" article), and I had some difficulty rendering "ouːr" in "Thór" as "uː" is respelled "oo". I therefore added a swung dash ("~") to the respelled pronunciation to indicate that it was a diphthong, otherwise it would have appeared as "thooor". What aspects of the respelled pronunciation did you find unintelligible? About the unvoiced "r" – I've never studied phonology, but what about using "ɹ"? Or is that not quite accurate? Cheers, Jacklee 01:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, ɹ is not an unvoiced r. I guess I understand your pronunciation key now but I don't quite see the point. Why use two systems and why should this be the second one? IPA is something standard which is known by many people while I have never encountered what you're proposing before. Haukur 01:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I thought it would be helpful to provide the average English-speaking Wikipedia user with an approximate respelled pronunciation, mainly for convenience but also especially since some of the symbols you have used such as /tʰ/ and /kʰ/ do not appear in the "IPA chart for English" or "International Phonetic Alphabet for English" articles. It's therefore difficult for users to work out how the words are in fact pronounced. Respelled pronunciations are common in concise dictionaries; less so in the comprehensive ones such as the Oxford English Dictionary. Any number of different respelling systems could be adopted, I suppose – I chose this particular one because it is set out in the article "Help:Pronunciation respelling key" and appears to be the standard one used in Wikipedia. Is there some way of getting around the problem with the unvoiced "r"? It's rather mystifying to see a square in the middle of the IPA transcription. Cheers, Jacklee 01:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've never heard of any standard used on Wikipedia except IPA. I don't know about the merits of this particular system but if it's meant to be intuitive I'm not sure how well it succeeds. For example I doubt most readers will realize that they're supposed to pronounce 'dh' as a fricative. Where this cluster appears in English it's usually either in compounds or in loan words from Sanskrit or its derivatives (like dharma). In those words it is, if I'm not mistaken, pronounced [d] in English and [dʰ] in Sanskrit. Haukur 02:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot. The [tʰ] and [kʰ] sounds are common in English; they're the first sounds in 'take' and 'cake' respectively. The [t] and [k] sounds are found in 'steak' and 'score'. A broad phonetic transcription of English might not indicate this difference but it is phonemic in Icelandic and thus crucial to note. Haukur 02:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since you feel quite strongly about the matter, I guess we can leave out the respelled pronunciation. However, I think someone needs to produce an article that helps people who are not familiar with the IPA to relate the symbols to the sounds. Right now there's the article "International Phonetic Alphabet for English" but that doesn't seem comprehensive enough because, for example, it doesn't mention anything about how to pronounce [tʰ] and [kʰ]. Also, because IPA is also used in languages other than English, there needs to be a guide on how to pronounce symbols used in such languages. The main "International Phonetic Alphabet" article is too technical – it is no help to me to know that [ɕ] is a "voiceless palatalized postalveolar (alveolo-palatal) fricative". Does this sound like a project you might want to take on? ;-) Cheers, Jacklee 16:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garðar Thór Cortes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cortes.is/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010106084100/http://www.whsmith.co.uk/whs/go.asp?Menu=Music to http://www.whsmith.co.uk/whs/go.asp?menu=Music&pagedef=%2Fmusic%2Fcharts%2Fclassical_1.htm&promotion=music_charts_class
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cortes.is/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.cortes.is/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]