This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Gamlingay Cinques appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. There are no objections other than mine, and I can accept the nominator's assertions. The village, if it exists, is not significant. — Amakuru (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, leaning oppose at the moment as far as I can see, Gamlingay Cinques is a village, and the common is a feature within that village. As we don't have an article for the village, it redirects to Gamlingay, which includes a mention of Gamlingay Cinques. The link to the Wildlife Trust page above also seems to call it "Cinques Common" at one point, so I don't think this is a straightforward move, and should be discussed here. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator. I cannot find any evidence that Gamlingay Cinques is a village. It is referred to in the Gamlingay article and on the website of the Gamlingay and District History Society at [2] as an outlying area of Gamlingay. This is the only information I can find on Gamlingay Cinques as an area, so although it obviously does exist in this form, it does not appear to be notable and there do not appear to be any reliable sources for an article on it. Gamlingay Cinques as a nature reserve (also known as Cinques Common) does have a reliable source, the Wildlife Trust web page at [3]. Another source about Gamlingay Cinques as a nature reserve is an article in the local newspaper at [4]. The author refers to having lived in "the Cinques", and Gamlingay Cinques as a Registered Village Green managed by the Wildlife Trust. I therefore think that the Gamlingay Cinques article should be about the nature reserve, but mention that it is a name for the area, citing the History Society web page. I cannot find any reliable sources for keeping the existing name, Gamlingay Cinques Common. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.