Talk:Gamers: The Movie

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have also found this Chris Folino, which is created by the same wiki author and have tagged it.

All I can find on the movie itself is this http://digg.com/movies/_Gamers:_The_Movie_Teaser_Trailer, which is not much. Nzv8fan 07:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything on the GenCon site or doing a search to substantiate some of the stuff in this article, so I've removed some of it and tried for a general clean up. It certainly did win an award at MUFF in 2006, and has been highly praised by indie film web sites, though everything was rather too positive for a neutral point of view. Then there was the use of "Melbourne Film Festival", which rather suggested the Melbourne International Film Festival rather than the rather less prestigious MUFF. Please improve on my edits! -- Guybrush (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maxing out

What does 'maxing out' mean? Can this be put in standard English please? Alpheus (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Concerns about a possible conflict of interest regarding this article and its creator and most frequent contributor have been raised at WP:COIN. Whoville (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is where I found the majority of the good reviews for the movie: http://buygamers.com/reviews.htm. I then substantiated all of the quotes from the links on that page to the independent sources. Apparently GenCon has taken down that reference to the movie since I first wrote the article. I will try to find further substantiation for that claim. Regarding the claim of CONFLICT OF INTEREST, I do not have ANY financial interest in this movie and do not benefit from it in the least. I was merely writing about a movie and up-and-coming director that I felt deserved recognition. Both the movie and the director have received a great deal of acclaim for this work. And I would argue there are a great many movies on Wikipedia with far less recognition. I do apologize if any of my writing is below par for Wikipedia's standards. These are my first entries and I am still learning. I welcome the help of the community. But I would ask that a notable subject not be penalized because of my lack of experience. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Encyclopedia Mike (talk • contribs) 18:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC) --96.225.204.36 (talk) 05:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gamers: The Movie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071214124419/http://www.muff.com.au:80/2006/ to http://www.muff.com.au/2006/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]