Talk:Game On (The West Wing)

A fact from Game On (The West Wing) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the debate in "Game On" invokes the beer question?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Game On (The West Wing episode).

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage / The West Wing Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the West Wing task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 11 September 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per consensus. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Game On (The West Wing episode) → Game On (The West Wing) – Draftified, but now I want to move back to the original theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 22:12, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I do not believe the word "episode" is used in an article title to disambiguate from others. From my experience, only the show name is used (like with "Mother's Day" (Rugrats)) for these cases. Aoba47 (talk) 00:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support although this seems a noncontroversial move and an RM not needed. Randy Kryn (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )

( Article history links:

)

~~... that the opening scene of "Game On" was summarized as "Bartlet ... decid[ing] to spend his precious minutes leading to the debate fucking with Toby"?~~ Bartlet has decided to spend his precious minutes leading to the debate fucking with Toby
- ALT1: ... that the debate in "Game On" invokes the beer question? One of the election-season clichés that has been a standby in previous cycles, and that has been obliterated in this one, is the Beer Question.... It’s the question at the heart of “Game On,” the West Wing episode that finds President Bartlet in a climactic, live-televised meet-up with his Republican challenger, Florida’s Governor Ritchie. The episode may only loosely feature beer; it revolves, though, around the qualities the Beer Question really tests: matters of “relatability” and, with them, “authenticity.”

Reviewed: Anthony Ciulla, Karl-Heinz Petzinka
Comment: This article has jumped through a few moves, but it was expanded from a redirect yesterday.
Second comment: While ALT0 is a good hook, ALT1 is the only one that includes the second nominated article, so—it should probably be the one considered.

Converted from a redirect by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 22:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Review underway. BusterD (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great on both. The new page in particular is a nice write! Both articles clearly pass newness/length/neutral/cites and are well-composed. QPQ good. Lots of hits on Earwig but that's because of cited quotation discussed in the text. No close paraphasing or copyvios. This is a nice, punchy, tight and intriguing double DYK. Am I missing something? BusterD (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Yeah, I don't know why some get sat on for a while—just happens. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T:DYK/P7