Template:Did you know nominations/Game On (The West Wing episode)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Game On (The West Wing), the beer question
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
... that the opening scene of "Game On" was summarized as "Bartlet ... decid[ing] to spend his precious minutes leading to the debate fucking with Toby"?Bartlet has decided to spend his precious minutes leading to the debate fucking with Toby- ALT1: ... that the debate in "Game On" invokes the beer question? One of the election-season clichés that has been a standby in previous cycles, and that has been obliterated in this one, is the Beer Question.... It’s the question at the heart of “Game On,” the West Wing episode that finds President Bartlet in a climactic, live-televised meet-up with his Republican challenger, Florida’s Governor Ritchie. The episode may only loosely feature beer; it revolves, though, around the qualities the Beer Question really tests: matters of “relatability” and, with them, “authenticity.”
- Reviewed: Anthony Ciulla, Karl-Heinz Petzinka
- Comment: This article has jumped through a few moves, but it was expanded from a redirect yesterday.
- Second comment: While ALT0 is a good hook, ALT1 is the only one that includes the second nominated article, so—it should probably be the one considered.
Converted from a redirect by Theleekycauldron (talk). Self-nominated at 22:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC).
Looks great on both. The new page in particular is a nice write! Both articles clearly pass newness/length/neutral/cites and are well-composed. QPQ good. Lots of hits on Earwig but that's because of cited quotation discussed in the text. No close paraphasing or copyvios. This is a nice, punchy, tight and intriguing double DYK. Am I missing something? BusterD (talk) 23:16, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Yeah, I don't know why some get sat on for a while—just happens. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
