Talk:Gallileo (skyscraper)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Is this the Gallileo?

I doubt this is the most notable Gallileo. Let's discuss it on the disambiguation page. PizzaMan (♨♨) 21:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, this is the only thing spelled galLileo with two L's. PizzaMan (♨♨) 14:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made the same mistake, but I think the "notability ratio" in this case is so extreme that Gallileo is probably better as a redirect-from-misspelling than it is to the skyscraper. If I've offended anyone, I apologize; it's not unfixable, though it would require admin help. But my personal opinion is it's better this way. --Trovatore (talk) 08:52, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]