Talk:Fuzzy classification

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

While obvious effort has gone into the text, this article is somewhat of a mess including that passages are repeated. I am suspicious that words like consequentially (instead of consequently) indicate that this article is not designed for the easy reading of those who would like to become familiar with these ideas.

It would be very helpful to have a common English-language overview of what fuzzy classification is before we get into the esoteric formal symbols. That is, the plain language overview descriptions may (1) be sufficient for the needs of certain readers and (2) help us to understand the meaning of the formal symbols.

Start a discussion about improving the Fuzzy classification page

Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Fuzzy classification" page.

Start a discussion