Talk:Funding bias

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Science Mid‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inspiration

I created this article based on comments from a conversation at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Science/2010 April 14#Research influenced by funding source. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources to examine

The following sources were cited in an old, deleted version of this article. They are worth examining for incorporating later. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Als-Nielsen, B., Chen, W., Gluud, C., Kjaergard, L.L. “Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug Trials”, JAMA, Vol 290, No 7, pp 921-927. AMA 2003. 2006Apr18.
Bekelman, J.E., Gross, C.P., Li, Y. “Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review”, JAMA, Vol 289, No 4, pp 454-465. AMA 2003. 2006Apr18.
Chopra, S.S. “Industry Funding of Clinical Trials: Benefit or Bias?”, JAMA, Vol 290, No 1, pp 113-115. AMA 2003. 2006Apr18.
Clifford, T.J., Barrowman, N.J., Moher, D. “Funding Source, trial outcome and reporting quality: Are they related? Results of a pilot study”, BMC Health Services Research, Vol 2, No 18. Clifford et al 2002. 2006Apr18.
Cockburn, I.M., Henderson, R.M. “Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery”, The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol 46, No 2, pp 157-182. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 1998. 2006Apr18.
Del Mar, C., Askew, D. “Building Family/General Practice Research Capacity”, Annals of Family Medicine, Vol 2, Sup 2, pp S35-S40. 2004. 2006Apr18.
Gupta, M. “A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations”, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol 9, No 2, pp 111-121. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2003. 2006Apr18.
Sa Couto, J. “An objectivist’s view on the ethics of evidence-based medicine: commentary on ‘A critical appraisal of evidence-based medicine: some ethical considerations’(Gupta 2003; JECP)”, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practices, Vol 9, No 2, pp 137-139. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2003. 2006Apr18.
Yaphe, J., Edman, R., Herman, J., Knishkowy, B. “The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials”, Family Practice, Vol 18, No 6, pp 565-568. Oxford University Press 2001. 2006Apr18.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Funding bias. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130521050439/http://www.medico-legalsociety.org.uk/articles/dishonesty_in_medical_research.pdf to http://www.medico-legalsociety.org.uk/articles/dishonesty_in_medical_research.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]