Talk:Fukuoka Tower

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:59, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History needing a source before adding

Fukuoka Tower was original intended to have many more floors and be taller than Tokyo Tower. Tokyo objected, as as a compromise only the top of the tower was built. The stiffness of the building, designed to be much higher, means that even on a windy day, the movement at the top is only 2mm, compared with an originally planned 2m. Does anyone have an English source for any of this? Stephen B Streater (talk) 19:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for Improvement

It would be great to include the purpose, function and/or reason for it's construction of this tower in the article. I assume that it is for communication but why all the mirrors on the outside? Why are the mirrors half mirrors T S Ballantine (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What else is in the building?

Is there anything else in the building? The article mentions only the three observation decks. Are there also offices? Are there residences? Is it a hotel? At the very least, is it a fancy communications tower? This is very basic information that should be among the first things discussed in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.4.239.249 (talk) 23:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]