Talk:FuG 200 Hohentwiel
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FuG 200 Hohentwiel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Land-based or air-based?
[edit]I can infer from the opening paragraph that this was an air-mounted radar system, but that's not clear. The opening description should say clearly which type of radar this was. —2602:306:CC8A:9930:A05D:F2C4:E0EA:ACE (talk) 22:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Maritime patrol" seems pretty clear. You don't patrol by sitting still. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- Germany articles needing attention
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class German military history articles
- German military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Wikipedia articles that use British English