Talk:French ironclad Amiral Duperré

French ironclad Amiral Duperré has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 29, 2020. (Reviewed version).

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

Illustration

There's a nice illustration of this ship here. Parsecboy (talk) 18:55, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French ironclad Amiral Duperré/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 12:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one soon. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I don't really have the time to continue this. 'Cause of our lockdown, school and real life issues I won't be that much online for a week or longer. :/ Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem, I'll see if I can get someone to take it over. We're in a similar boat here - working from home if we can, schools are all closed, etc. Stay safe over there! Parsecboy (talk) 11:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this later today. Harrias ^talk 12:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Harrias, much appreciated. Parsecboy (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Design

"..which was installed aboard Amiral Duperré.[1] Amiral Duperré provided the basis.." Avoid the repetition of "Amiral Duperre" if possible.
- Done
"The center 340 0m gun.." Typo.
- Fixed

Service history

Could you clarify in the article that Ajaccio is on Corsica.
- Good idea
Why include the part about Theodore Ropp's suggestion that it happened in 1890? The Naval Annual was published in 1889; the fact that it reported on it at that stage means that it could not have happened in 1890. At best, Ropp is referring to a different incident, at worst, he is just plain wrong, surely? This doesn't seem to be a case where either could plausibly be correct, and we have to provide balance.
- That's a good point - when I was writing the article, I had looked at Ropp first, and then just modified it with Brassey's account later.

References

All formatted appropriately and consistently, to reliable sources.

Images

File:Italian battleship Italia (1880) at La Spezia 1897.jpg – I'm uncertain how this meets the US PD requirement: do we know that it was first published outside the US (this isn't asserted, the scan is from a book published in New York). Similarly, the book it was published in dates from 1979, and I am sure will be copyrighted.
- The photo would have been out of copyright in the country of origin in 1917, since they use the date of creation, not publication - that puts it out of copyright well before the URAA date. Original publication of old images is notoriously difficult to establish, but we can safely assume that Conway's was not the original one.
  - @Nikkimaria: Any chance you could take a look at this image I'm a bit unsure, and feel uncomfortable signing the GA review off while I remain uncertain. Harrias ^talk 18:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Is Conway's the first publication that can be confirmed? Does any attribution appear in that work? Nikkimaria (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - It's the only one I've seen - it's attributed to the Aldo Fraccaroli collection, though he was not alive to have taken it. Parsecboy (talk) 13:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        Okay. So the potential issue here is point #2 of the URAA tag - publication date. Does Conway's have a copyright notice? Nikkimaria (talk) 01:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        For the book? Yes it does. Parsecboy (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        Right. So the Italian tag in use gives a publication date cutoff of 1978 for US PD status, and the Conway's ref is 1979. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
        Replaced with File:'Italia,' first class ironclad of the Italian Navy LCCN2003672917 cropped.jpg. Thanks Nikki. Parsecboy (talk) 09:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise all the images are appropriately licensed.

Infobox

Guy-Victor Duperré is listed as the namesake, but this isn't referenced, or mentioned in the body.
- I can't find a source, so I'll remove it. Thanks for taking on the review, Harrias! Parsecboy (talk) 17:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, there's not much wrong with this one, nice work. Harrias ^talk 10:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- - Cheers, with that change of image, this is all good. Thanks for your help, Nikkimaria. Harrias ^talk 09:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]