Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose

2. Verifiability

3. Depth of Coverage

4. Neutral

5. Stable

6. Illustrations

7. Miscellaneous

Comments

1.

Rochefort is a duplink
- Good catch, sometimes I forget to go back through and check for those.

2.

3.

I'm going to go ahead and assumed that while the namesake can probably be easily inferred, no source states it directly.
- Yes, unfortunately.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Honestly, that's it. To me at least, it clearly meets the GA requirements, so I'm going to do something I've never done before and just quick-pass this one. Very good work, I really hope I didn't miss something. Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]