Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat

French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat is part of the Protected cruisers of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 29, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed
October 19, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 26, 2020.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the French cruisers Pascal (pictured), Descartes, Bugeaud, and Chasseloup-Laubat were deployed to East Asia as part of France's response to the Boxer Uprising in Qing China?

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:French cruiser Chasseloup-Laubat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 19:23, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

1. Prose

2. Verifiability

3. Depth of Coverage

4. Neutral

5. Stable

6. Illustrations

7. Miscellaneous

Comments

1.

Rochefort is a duplink
- Good catch, sometimes I forget to go back through and check for those.

2.

3.

I'm going to go ahead and assumed that while the namesake can probably be easily inferred, no source states it directly.
- Yes, unfortunately.

4.

5.

6.

7.

Honestly, that's it. To me at least, it clearly meets the GA requirements, so I'm going to do something I've never done before and just quick-pass this one. Very good work, I really hope I didn't miss something. Hog Farm (talk) 03:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 14:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]