Talk:Fourth National Government of New Zealand

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand: Politics Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as High-importance).

Bolding in section on 'Ruthanasia'

Is there a particular reason why certain phrases are bolded in this section? I haven't seen similar practice elsewhere on Wikipedia. The casual observer might think one of the page editors was trying to highlight contentious phrases for some reason. Any ideas? Samf-nz (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Originally that and several other sections were in bullet point form. When they were changed to paragraph form the phrases saying what the specific policies were were highlighted. This has also been done on several other NZ government pages (see the Foreign Affairs and Military section of First Labour Government of New Zealand, for example). It isn't very widespread, though, so it could be got rid of, if people think it doesn't work. --Helenalex (talk) 03:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Winebox Inquiry needs a mention Mrfebruary (talk) 11:46, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]