Talk:Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 October 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Central America

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles

More footnotes vs no footnotes

Hi MPGuy2824 (talk · contribs) :) you tagged this article as ``no footnotes`` but it looks like this tag should only be used for article with *no* footnotes, so did you mean to tag ``more footnotes`` (meaning there are some general references that are not used in inline citations, as is the case in this article)? [To clarify, this article does have some inline citations, but there are some general references that are currently unlinked from the inline citations, so those could do with being linked.] Asdfjrjjj (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I not sure what went wrong there. Maybe because the refs aren't in the usual format. I've removed the tag. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:25, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointers

Possible pointers to improve article –

add website infobox, as the terms 'FAMSI' and 'Foundation ... Studies, Inc' seem to be used both for the legal body and the website,
fix organisation infobox, as the legal body itself seems to now be 'held in stewardship' by LACMA (possibly a US steward-ownership sort of thing), despite Florida dissolution,
fix lead para to reflect above points more clearly / unambiguously,
add content from unlinked full refs, eg add a short history sec?

Will prolly come back to do this soon / in future :) – Asdfjrjjj (talk) 02:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]