Talk:Forum Theatre

	Australia portal Forum Theatre is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 5 December 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Forum Melbourne. The result of the discussion was not moved.

ownership by church of scientology?

saw Tim Minchin at the forum last night and he said that the theater was once owned by the Church of Scientology. does anyone know if is this true?Pugsworth (talk) 05:04, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 December 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forum Theatre → Forum Melbourne – This seems to be its current name, and the name "Forum Theatre" is hardly mentioned, and not referenced, in the article - although I see that the Wikimedia category is Forum Theatre. So just looking for views on the talk page. I don't know the venue myself. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. "Forum Melbourne" is the branding of the current business, whereas the article covers the whole 100-year history of the building, which is (then and now) known as the Forum Theatre. Given that, I don't think "Forum Melbourne" is really an accurate name for anything before the current owners - the building serves a different function now compared to most of its pre-1995 uses. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'm not opposed to this, just think that the various names need to be better represented in the lead and explained in the body. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a crack at it - your suggestion turned out to be a really good idea, because there were a couple of details that weren't clear in some of the more easily-found online sources. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thanks for that, The Drover's Wife. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.