Talk:Fort McClellan

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

United States Territories

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Territories of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject United States TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject United States TerritoriesUnited States Territories articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Public Domain

Much of this text was adapted from http://www.mcclellan.army.mil/Info.asp, a website owned and operated by the US Army. As such, it is not subject to copyright. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:PD#Governmental_works for more information. ClarkBHM 07:00, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Base closure

If the Training Brigade was deactivated in April 1970, why was it still there until the 1999 when it was moved to Ft Leonard Wood? Particularly since I went through Basic there in 1981. Just asking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marccarlson (talk • contribs) 03:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See this section of the Chemical Corps article.

"An ad hoc committee, designed to study possibilities recommended that the Chemical Corps' smoke and flame mission be integrated into the Engineer Corps and the chemical operations be integrated into the Ordnance Corps. The groups recommendations were accepted in December 1972 and the United States Army Chemical Corps was officially disbanded, but not formally disestablished, by the Army on January 11, 1973 . . . the U.S. Congress had to approve the move, because it had officially established the Chemical Corps in 1946. Congress chose to table action on the fate of the Chemical Corps, leaving it in limbo for several years.[18] Recruitment and career advancement was halted and the Chemical School at Fort McClellan was shut down and moved to Aberdeen Proving Grounds . . . Secretary of the Army Martin R. Hoffmann rescinded the 1972 recommendations and in 1976 Army Chief of Staff General Bernard W. Rogers ordered the resumption of Chemical Corps officer commissioning. However, the U.S. Army Chemical School at Fort McClellan, Alabama did not reopen until 1980. (emphasis mine)

And the Chemical Corps article has actual sources to boot, unlike most of this article's text. IvoShandor (talk) 06:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious

I suspect someone or some agency of editing out or deleting certain information from this article pertaining to the exposure of service members who served at the base to toxic chemicals and ionizing radiation. Monsanto? Solutia? US ARMY? 2602:63:C2A2:AF00:687C:1006:1F8B:AEC9 (talk) 23:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's the Pentagon. The lawyer working on my VA case has a copy of a letter sent to the US Representatives office who had introduced the Fort McClellan registry act. This letter clearly states that the Pentagon does not want that registry because in, a summary of their words, it says that they couldn't afford it with the number of claims that would come in. The current camp was June thing is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the military and chemical exposures of troops 71.29.23.172 (talk) 10:27, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was at McClellan in '84, ended up medically discharged. The funny thing is, i can't seem to locate any records that show i was OSUT there... 174.214.49.80 (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Guard Training

I added a citation needed regarding the notorious difficulty of the officer training. This very well could be notoriously difficult training, but after a quick look for a reference, I could not find one. I will look further,and if I find one, I will add it. Anyone who can cite this fact, please do so.Horst59 (talk) 04:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pollution

The lede includes this statement, not referenced in the main article: Storage, use and disposal of chemical weapons and waste contaminated soil and water supply and exposed the population. This needs elaboration, and preferably a cite. Valetude (talk) 13:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort McClellan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]