Talk:Formalist–substantivist debate
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 9 February 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved: this could probably have been requested as an uncontroversial move at WP:RM/TR (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The formalist vs substantivist debate → Formalist–substantivist debate – Typically, article titles pairing two concepts contain an en dash (e.g. Canada–United States border), and titles shouldn't start with articles. Qzekrom (talk) 23:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CONSISTENCY, WP:CONCISE, WP:THE. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 04:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support per above. Daask (talk) 14:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.