Talk:Foreign involvement in the Yemeni civil war (2014–present)

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 December 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.

Yemen Low‑importance

	Yemen portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

reverted info

Noticed the revert on my moving of content. This was mostly info that seemed to be taking up a lot of space in the main Yemeni Civil War article, and I though this might've been a better place to put it + I wanted to reduce article bloat XTheBedrockX (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By bloating this one. Also much of that material seems to no be about either this conflict or the subject of the section (and reads like editorializing). Added to which I am unsure some of the sources pass RS. And there is also a lot of speculation about who is selling what. It therefore (I think) failed wp:unude, wp:or and wp:rs. Slatersteven (talk) 16:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is oddly passive aggressive, but okay.

I'll admit, double-checking it, that I noticed not all those sources pass WP:RS, which is my bad. But a lot of them also do, and most of the added content was about weapons sales (which this page mentions a fair bit), which is why I was a little caught off-guard by the whole-sale revert. XTheBedrockX (talk) 17:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make a case-by-case justification and explain why it is relevant. Slatersteven (talk) 17:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]