Talk:For the Birds (film)

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as High-importance).

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:For the Birds.jpg

Image:For the Birds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

style and content

Is it just me or does someone else also feel like they are reading a preschool renarration? The "plot" section is not even a summary. It's a most naive "first and then and then and then" way that is neither exciting nor enlightening to the reader. No offense meant to the author but does WP really require this kind of redundancy? -- Kku (talk) 08:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably someone young who wrote it, and the writing can be improved. I don't think it needs to be this long, either. It should be written to be more to the point; citing Allmovie would be a good place to start. If you can, be bold and fix it! I can try myself later today if I am not too busy. Erik (talk | contribs) 11:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Species

I removed the link to lesser rhea, which definitely doesn't look like the big bird in this short. It looks more like a shoebill to me, but I don't think the species has ever been given. - Brian Kendig (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Were they the same species?

The big bird and the small ones had the same kind of feathers, same colour and shape. So was the big one different or the same species, just grown wrong? 73.146.229.18 (talk) 19:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this a link?

Why is this in the external links section? ForTheBirds.com an online shop for bird seed subscriptions and bird feeders. 2600:4040:7B78:1000:8D68:C30A:B572:639F (talk)Tim 2600:4040:7B78:1000:8D68:C30A:B572:639F (talk) 15:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]