This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
A fact from Folkestone White Horse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 17,778 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page.
Given that the damage to the site made it illegal and it was judged to be such by the EU, what happened in the end? Was there an appeal? Did the relevant authorities let it drop? Was the law broken with impunity? The article doesn't make the outcome of the legal dispute clear. Beorhtwulf (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly becasue the 'damage' to the site was so small as to be insignificant, it is likely that the directive was simply ignored, possibly inspired by the obvious fact the some other EU states don't pay much attention to EU laws either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.53.190 (talk) 13:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
