Talk:Flora of Nepal

Nepal Mid‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Wildlife of Nepal was copied or moved into Flora of Nepal with this edit on 19 December 2018‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 January 2020 and 1 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gianni Demasco.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improvement

Thanks @Alisheem for your work and contribution to this page!

After a review of the voice you've expanded, please let me share with you some suggestion for improvement of the overall content quality:

The general structure of the page lack has some issues with the hierarchical subdivsion in sections and then subsection
The references used often date back to the early 2000s and results a bit outdated. Also, some of them lack of an appropriate formatting in the reference list, missing valuable information on page numbers and title formatting.
In the opening section some "strong" generic affirmations - making usage of too general adjective (e.g. certain) or with specific number not reported in the citated source - are included without a punctual or any reference. Please consider improve the affidability of the content with the addition of appropriate references.
The entire section dedicated to plant consumption seems only drafted and not well structured. Please try to revise it a bit more, including valuable references and information. Also, many generic sentences not referring (apparently) specifically to the topic of the page are included without reference.
Regarding the tiger picture, please be careful including only images that are meaningful for the scope of the page.

Hope these suggestions could help you improving your adventure on Wikipedia.

Best,

--FedericaGaspari (talk) 13:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @FedericaGaspari; the tiger image seems not coherent with the the content of the page. Best regards :) --NunzioDimola (talk) 13:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]