Talk:Flip Benham
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Extremely BPOV
[edit]This article is EXTREMELY biased: "He then began a career as a Christian minister and activist, promoting God's Laws and respect for all human life." "He demonstrated for Terri Schiavo, a woman who was starved and dehydrated by order of a judge based on a claim made by her husband." My lord. I'll change it later, maybe, when I have time. Does anyone agree with me on this point? -Theaterfreak64 08:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree with you personally, as i find many of the things that he and his organization promotes to be very personally offended. I have put the neutrality tag on it; however i am not a christian and therefore cant pretend to know anything about how to fix this. Can someone who is christian please change it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.74.95 (talk) 01:09, 11 July 2006
I am a pro-life Xian with very similar views to Flip and the changes made to both referenced excerpts look acceptable, so I removed the BPOV and neutral tags. If anyone thinks they should be re-added, please do so. I did leave the references tag up, because the article doesn't propery site references, but after digging around some of the related links it looks like most of the material is out there. I just don't have time to clean it up now, I'm not familiar with proper references guidelines in wikipedia to make the changes yet. I'll revisit sometime soon and make more updates if someone else doesn't do it. And no, I am not related to Flip, I ended up finding this article after doing a Google search on my last name. ;) Davebenham 16:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
external links
[edit]All four of the external links are to pages with distinct (and strong) points of view regarding the subject of the article. (I count 3 pro-choice and 1 that purports to point out a logical contradiction in his thinking but otherwise is unclear as to its main point.) On the other hand, it is hard to find any neutral treatment of him on the Internet at all. Does anybody have any suggestions on how to clean up the list of external links? For example, what does the mainstream anti-abortion movement think of him? Bwrs (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Flip Benham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121217200929/https://secure.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=801944&category=OPINION to https://secure.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=801944&category=OPINION
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727035819/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/07/02/2423347/anti-abortion-activist-guilty.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/07/02/2423347/anti-abortion-activist-guilty.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Resent Activity
[edit]You took away my heart and Told me we were different Beautiful, with room to grow You left me in the morning Softly without warning How was I supposed to know?
Oh, I'm trying
Give me a reason
To let you go 'cause
Right now, I can't
I'm in pain
I'm in pain
Mm
And I feel lost without you
Never thought to doubt you
Oh, who else is there to blame?
So save your best excuses
They can't get me through this
Maybe time can, maybe space
Oh, I'm trying
Give me a reason
To let you go 'cause
Right now, I can't
I'm in pain
I'm in pain
Should I say I'm sorry?
Did I mess it up?
All that you got from me
Was it not enough?
I'm in pain
I'm in pain
You're to blame
I'm in pain
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class Abortion articles
- Unknown-importance Abortion articles
- WikiProject Abortion articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles