Talk:FlatWorld

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

This is a stub, but there are news articles about FWK, a number of notable partners working with them, and they are directly working on public / government proposals. They submitted books to the recent CA call for open textbooks (looking for a ref). I'm on a v flaky connection, so I'll add more later... check some of the inbound links for more. There are a few other open text publishers with real funding and public initiatives with little to no WP coverage... +sj + 19:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion to encyclopedic article.

There has been significant and notable coverage of Flat World Knowledge since the stub was created and with much work, an encyclopedic article is now established and cited. Ozlingkb (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing of "paid" formats

Does anyone know what the licensing of the paid formats is? The text of the books themselves is CC licensed, but since they charge to download pdfs and ebooks, I wonder if those files are CC licensed, or if they are proprietary to prevent redistribution. Easy to imagine one student in a class downloading the pdf and then redistributing it to the entire class if that is legally allowed. mcs (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flat World Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120316120303/http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/chapters/open-content/ to http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/chapters/open-content/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Flat World Knowledge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

removing tag

cause I've cut a lot of text Likeanechointheforest (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]