Talk:Flag of San Diego County, California
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by AirshipJungleman29 talk 00:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that although it was adopted in February 1957, an actual San Diego County flag would not be made until September 1957? Source: https://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/cob/docs/cacs/countyflag.pdf
- Reviewed:
Created by Illegitimate Barrister (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 23 past nominations.
Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.– Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 02:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC).
- Earwig flagged this. There is a large copy/paste in this piece. --evrik (talk) 19:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's fine, since it's a public domain source (Californian government). – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please somehow set aside all the copy/paste stuff as quotes. --evrik (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Article has now been rewritten, so the copy-paste from PD source is less direct. Length, date, hook ok. Ideally File:Flag_of_San_Diego_County,_California.png should be added to the nomination as well. However, the nominator needs to provide a QPQ for this to be ticked. --Soman (talk) 11:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please somehow set aside all the copy/paste stuff as quotes. --evrik (talk) 21:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's fine, since it's a public domain source (Californian government). – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 20:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough. The hook is "meh". No QPQ done. Large amount of quoted text needs better clarification. I'm not going to review this article anymore. --evrik (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- New reviewer needed. --evrik (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- . The QPQ hasnt been done after weeks, also has various errors. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- QPQ done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but where is the QPQ? You must add a link here in the template somewhere. --Soman (talk) 10:47, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- QPQ done. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 05:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- . The QPQ hasnt been done after weeks, also has various errors. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- I just went through Illegitimate Barrier's contributions. He has only edited two DYK nomination pages since May 2020, this one and this edit to Kirby: King of Comics, which absolutely does not count as a QPQ. This needs a full QPQ, and I would suggest stepping on it.--Launchballer 13:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's not a QPQ.--Launchballer 18:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Rejecting hook because of lack of QPQ. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's not a QPQ.--Launchballer 18:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)