Talk:Fitzroya

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile Mid‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina Mid‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Flora and Fauna of Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Fitzroya, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles

Merge Proposal

Colonial alerce logging and trade should be part of the history section. No need for a separate article. Benny White (talk) 05:42, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. A clear situation for a merge. Tdslk (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error with image

Hi. The image at right side is not of an alerce, it could be Podocarpus nubigenus. Compare with this branch or make a search in Internet. Bye. Lin linao (talk) 05:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure this is an error? The branchlet you linked looks very different because those are adult leaves. The seedling would have juvenile leaves, which tend to look very different and more needle-like on most Cupressaceae. The seedling is also almost certainly not a Podocarpus, as they have alternating leaves. This seedling seems to have opposite leaves at the bottom and then whorls of three higher up, exactly like would be expected of a Fitzroya. Nucatum amygdalarum (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you're right. I've seen (perhaps) hundreds of small plants of this species, but I can't bet that they are not adult small plants because of its harsh environment. Thank you for your explanation. Lin linao (talk) 02:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not 100% granted that seedling really is Fitzroya, since many Cupressoides seedlings look alike and errors occur; however it is quite safe to say that there is a clear difference between the branchless seedling stage and later branched stages with mature-plant needles. (Another example would be Thuja plicata.) --Rosetta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.181.19.197 (talk) 17:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fitzroya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140827141331/http://www.ecoscience.ulaval.ca/en/paper/fire-and-the-dynamics-of-fitzroya-cupressoides-alerce-forests-of-chile-s-cordillera-pelada to http://www.ecoscience.ulaval.ca/en/paper/fire-and-the-dynamics-of-fitzroya-cupressoides-alerce-forests-of-chile-s-cordillera-pelada

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New estimate of age

FWIW, check the link at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/a-new-candidate-for-oldest-tree-in-the-world-is-discovered-in-chile-180980167/?utm_source=smithsoniantopic&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20220605-weekender&spMailingID=46925714&spUserID=MTE4OTYyOTc3OTE0NgS2&spJobID=2260321521&spReportId=MjI2MDMyMTUyMQS2

It suggests that the tree is older than the bristlecone. Someone might like to do some investigation and editing. JonRichfield (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]