Talk:Fisheries in the Philippines
Fisheries in the Philippines is currently an Agriculture, food and drink good article nominee. Nominated by CMD (talk) at 19:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: Capture fisheries and aquaculture |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fisheries in the Philippines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Fisheries in the Philippines appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- ... that over the history of fisheries in the Philippines, the once dominant local municipal fisheries became supplanted first by commercial fisheries, and then by aquaculture? Source: Trends in the fisheries sector covering five decades, i.e., from the 1950s to the present, show the growth and decay of municipal fisheries. During the early 1950s, municipal fisheries comprised the bulk of fisheries production, which was 150 percent greater than the commercial sector...Then, the contribution of the municipal sector to total fishery production dropped drastically to a little over 30 percent of the total catch. By 1996, approximately 33 percent was contributed by the municipal sector, According to the volume of fisheries production data in the Philippines (1980–2010), capture fisheries have made up a high percentage (82%) of the total fisheries production for three decades, and the percentage of marine capture fisheries is 89% and that of inland fisheries is 11% among capture fisheries. The percentage of capture fisheries is decreasing recently, while that of aquaculture is growing, Aquaculture experienced a 4.58% growth rate and remained to be the top contributor to the country’s total volume of production, accounting for 54.15% share. Municipal fisheries contributed 25.96%, while commercial fisheries constituted up 19.89% share, both experiencing slight declines in terms of production volume
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Emi Shinohara
- Comment: Emi Shinohara is two reviews. Also reviewed were Pabhāvatī, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., and Verna Mersereau. This nomination combines five articles into one hook for administrative ease and to not repeat the same topic on DYK, although I can suggest individual hooks if desired. There's a fun fact about the death of Hirohito. Due to the interrelated nature of the articles there is duplicated text between them, however there should be a DYKs-worth of unique text in all. As always, open to other hook suggestions.
CMD (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC).
- Hot dang, amazing work with these articles. All five seem high quality, and I don't see any evidence of copyvio or other outstanding issues. All articles are eligible, and the hook is interesting enough and confirmed by the sources. QPQs check out. Is this planned to be a GT down the line? Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Replied on user talk. CMD (talk) 08:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fisheries in the Philippines/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Chipmunkdavis (talk · contribs) 19:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Rollinginhisgrave (talk · contribs) 02:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this on. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies for the delay, I've been taking a break. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your patience Chipmunkdavis, over to you. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 03:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Prose and content
[edit]They fall under the jurisdiction of
their relevantlocal government unit[s]- Done
poorly managed, and are overfished
WP:CINS- Reworded
have aimed to ensure fisheries are sustainable and prioritize the support of local fisherfolk while managing the challenges of overexploitation, habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change
a strange sentence; aiming to ensure they're sustainable and to prevent habitat destruction etc?- Reworded
the establishment of marine protected areas
the management technique would surely be more about upholding these marine protected areas rather than establishing them?- Interestingly it's both, local governments are mandated to create MPAs as part of their management responsibilities. Upholding is a separate sort of challenge.
Their main product is squalene, which is extracted for export.
This sentence is quite confusing without clicking through and reading, it needs some context- Reworded
while large boats range
range in use?- Reworded
which includes big-eye tuna, eastern little tuna, frigate tuna, skipjack, and yellowfin tuna.
This information is duplicating information from earlier. If you want to include it here as well, why would you not pick the four most important as listed earlier?- Trimmed
Many seaweed farms are small-scale and farmer-owned. Seaweed farming was often carried out alongside other methods of obtaining income, such as fishing.
why the switch in tenses?- Done
adding $4.33 billion to the economy
Which currency is this?- Done
Over 40% of imports are tuna
Why is imports relevant to fisheries?- You can cut down the nutrition section, if you are trying to identify trends then state it in prose rather than listing out so many numbers. You only need the most recent years figures. Also, none of it is about nutrition, but rather domestic consumption.
often being seen as a fallback for those unable to make a living otherwise.
MOS:DATED given two sentences ago you mentionthe collapse of municipal fishing
A fish market in Cubao
Cubao links to disambig- Odd. It was a redirect with possibilities. It seems it was turned into a redirect this July. I don't really see how most of those items fit a disambiguation page, and the first line definitely isn't in the usual disambiguation style. I would suggest leaving this as is, as Cubao is the clear primary topic of Cubao.
- Same with
The government identified 2,302,648 people as working in fisheries in 2022.
as cutting down nutrition section The depletion of fisheries in different parts of the country have exacerbated the precarious economic situation of many fisherfolk in some local areas.
This is a strange sentence, I'm not sure what it's adding the previous sentences, except perhaps clarifying that reduced catches are due to a depletion of fisheries- Reworded
Fisherfolk poverty continuously decreased from 2006 to 2018.
Why is this?- The source just reports the bare facts, but I suspect offhand it was a function of general economic growth rather than anything specific to fisheries.
The government has developed specific plans to try and address fisherfolk poverty
MOS:DATED- The redlinks in the "Size at which fish species are considered mature" are confusing; looking at the "Java parrotfish" for instance in the source gives the scientific name Scarus javanicus. This is despite, according to our article on Scarus, such a species not existing.
- Scarus javanicus is a synonym for Scarus hypselopterus. I've come across quite a few sources produced in Southeast Asia that seem to use outdated scientific names long after they were accepted as invalid.
the use of mangrove forests
could you explain what it means to "use" mangrove forests? Perhaps "fishing of" would be more appropriate?- Introduce acronym LGU on first use.
- Done
- Link Barangay
- Done
- Generally, I would say the page is too long and doesn't adhere to summary style. It is on a relatively niche topic and is at almost 10 000 words, which
Probably should be divided or trimmed
. I like the essay User:Trainsandotherthings/The Earth Test here. I do think reading at times can be a drag when excessive detail is gone into such as the Policy and legislation section and other examples given above.- This article was split into four subarticles during writing. If you have specific ideas for what more could be shifted down to those articles, that would be appreciated. CMD (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think the history section is insufficiently summary style; it's about 1/3 of the length of the article it's summarizing. It only really needs four paragraphs maximum given its use of Template:Main. Other things that can be cut are discussed above. I would say the volume of listing in prose makes the article harder to read, and more important examples can be chosen as representative. I'm also a bit uncertain about the extent to which the concept of "fisheries" extends. Does it refer to harvesting (as implied from the lede sentence)? Or does it refer to the entire commercial fishing industry? In the case of the former, it's undue to spend 500+ words discussing the international trade of the product of harvesting. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- History sections get us all in the end, that should all already be in the subarticle so I'll cut it down. The inclusion of the processing and sales information was due to it being present in many sources, which discuss markets for both the municipal and commercial fisheries. International trade gets its own section in the BFAR reports. CMD (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- That's fair. The international trade section can still be cut down, particularly the importation stuff as mentioned about. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- History sections get us all in the end, that should all already be in the subarticle so I'll cut it down. The inclusion of the processing and sales information was due to it being present in many sources, which discuss markets for both the municipal and commercial fisheries. International trade gets its own section in the BFAR reports. CMD (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- I think the history section is insufficiently summary style; it's about 1/3 of the length of the article it's summarizing. It only really needs four paragraphs maximum given its use of Template:Main. Other things that can be cut are discussed above. I would say the volume of listing in prose makes the article harder to read, and more important examples can be chosen as representative. I'm also a bit uncertain about the extent to which the concept of "fisheries" extends. Does it refer to harvesting (as implied from the lede sentence)? Or does it refer to the entire commercial fishing industry? In the case of the former, it's undue to spend 500+ words discussing the international trade of the product of harvesting. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 00:48, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- This article was split into four subarticles during writing. If you have specific ideas for what more could be shifted down to those articles, that would be appreciated. CMD (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Each LGU is able to implement this in their own chosen manner
, with there being no prescribed standard.- Done
Sangguniang Bayan or Sangguniang Panlungsod.
Why or?- Done
Local laws must be in line with national laws and policy.
What is the difference in this section between municipal authorities and LGUs?- LGU is the general term for municipal governments and city governments, it's not the most intuitive terminology.
- Could you explain the relationship between these two sentences?
At municipal, provincial, and national levels, Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Councils (FARMCs) are established through Fisheries Administrative Order (FAO) No. 196 from 2000 and its later amendments.
Fisheries and Aquatic Resource Management Councils were established through Executive Order 240.[9] These can be created at the barangay level, or at the city/municipality level.
- If you're going to note Fisheries Administrative Order is shortened to FAO, you should shorten all uses.
- Done
- Why do you sometimes identify FAOs as BFAR, and other times not?
- Removed
Onlyships larger than 20 GTThe Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act of 1997 provides some control over natural resources to recognized indigenous groups in their ancestral lands, meaning they can fish in recognized lands without registering so long as they follow fishing regulations, and other fisherfolk require special consent to fish in these areas.
condense this sentence, the second half is the most important- What are Letters of Instruction?
- The Restrictions on gear section can be heavily condensed, you can be more succinct with examples. Perhaps 2-3 sentences.
yet they can often be acceptable to local communities who might participate in setting their size and boundaries
could you elaborate on this?Closed seasons for specific species are enabled by the Philippine Fisheries Code.
this paragraph can be cut right down. It serves as a history of closed seasons rather than a brief overview.The FMAs were established through FAO 263.
why is it important to identify what number FAO this was established through?(fully named "An Act to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing")
unnecessaryMost cases were related to incidents within municipal fisheries, or areas with closed seasons.[8]: 14 The most common violations among BFAR cases are unauthorized fishing, using gear inappropriate for municipal fisheries, and unlicensed employees.
are these two sentences contradictory?forumlas
Plans to tackle IUU fishing include the 2013 National Plan of Action to Prevent, Deter, and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing and BFAR's 2019-2023 Fisheries Law Enforcement Operations Action Plan (FAO 271 of 2018).
I'll use this as an example of what I said earlier: "I would say the volume of listing in prose makes the article harder to read":
- Are these examples very important? If they are, and would pass GNG for instance, they are worth listing out in full. If there are elements to them that are important, those are what should be highlighted. For instance,
Plans to tackle IUU fishing include national plans and ones organized by BFAR.
I understand this can be clarified to be more precise, but I hope my point of taking the elements you want to highlight is crucial for adhering to summary style and improving readability and concision.
- Are these examples very important? If they are, and would pass GNG for instance, they are worth listing out in full. If there are elements to them that are important, those are what should be highlighted. For instance,
- In the research section, you're not trying to give a history of the research; if it's notable enough then it will go in Fisheries in the Philippines#History. You are trying to give an overview of current research.
area
beingcovered by live coralThis is despite the protection of mangrove forests actually bringing about positive economic outcomes for local fisheries.
NPOV, is the despite you or the source? It is unclear if these positive economic outcomes are greater than those when converted to aquaculture.- I really can't see the utility in listing examples of natural disasters, and if you do, listing five examples.
such as coasts, coral reefs, and mangroves
these examples of habitats have been made clear throughout the articlecause direct damage to many fisherfolk
it injures them?- Is there a reason east in "the East coast" is capitalized?
The introduction of payao, while increasing tuna fisheries, increased the catch of juvenile tuna, with some locations seeing 90% of catch being under a year old.
some redundancy as this repeats previous sentencesThese direct impacts occur alongside
what direct impacts?illegal fishing of foreign vessels
by foreign vessels?with control of coastal resources
waslikely exercisedfishery intensity
is this the appropriate word to modify? Would fishing be more appropriate?A provincial trawling bans was first issued
grammarsteadily until the mid-1970s, and starting growing again
WP:CINSThe mid-1970s saw the introduction of payao
introduction of modern payao?aimed at creating sustainability
also consider "promoting" instead of creatingin fisheriesThe
newly created1987 constitution- Integrated coastal zone management is a good link
Sources
[edit]The Verde Island Passage is possibly the most diverse marine area on the planet.
This sentence, particularly possibly doesn't really line up with the source.- Reworded
The value of marine ecosystem services is thought to be around US$966.6 billion.
This needs to include the continental shelf qualifier.- Done
826.01 thousand tons
source says "826.01 thousand MT"; to my understanding these are not the same thing. I can see the same issue further down the paragraph withThis included 1.48 million tons of seaweed
Further, it reads awkwardly, why not just 826,010 MT? This is accurate according to page 68 of the source.- Done throughout
perhaps10%- Done
Philippine environmental law is often regarded as very high quality
not really supported, especially by a 20 year old source.earned US$170 million, but caused US$1,640 million in environmental damage"
qualify that this is over a 20 year period.It is relatively understudied
MOS:DATEDThe first farmed fish is thought to be milkfish, collected from tidal waters and raised in brackish ponds.
url goes to incorrect chapter: use this- Link for "How many MPAs are there in the Philippines" appears broken
Spot check
[edit]- [10]
- [20a] I can't see in the source anything supporting the text
- [20b]
- [30]
- [40]
- [50]
- [60]
- [70] I wouldn't say this is a good summary of the sources, which should reflect that the majority are poorly managed, not just inconsistently. (Having looked at sources [69] and [71]
- [80] is this still true? The exhibition opened ostensibly before the carve-up into 12 FMAs.
- [90a]
- [90b] flagged above
- [100] (link issue flagged above)
Suggestions
[edit]- The short description is incorrect. The article probably doesn't need a short description.
- Done
are defined through the Philippine Fisheries Code of 1998 (RA 8550),[1] which defines
repetition of defines reads awkwardly- Reworded
- General comment: The article has a lot of statistics, which is okay, but it can make it harder to read at times. Some things are fine with prose, such as "Over half (62.88%) of caught fish come from five regions".
- Unsure what this means?
- I just mean you can cut the (62.88%) from the sentence and the meaning isn't changed and it reads more naturally and easily. Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Unsure what this means?
- 0.16 million tons → 160 thousand tons
- Done
- Some inconsistency in capitalization of PhP and spacing with number.
- Done what I think MOS:CURRENCY is asking
the cooperation of local and national government with fisherfolk and other stakeholders
→ "local and national governments to cooperate with..."- Done
- Quite a bit of MOS:OVERLINKING per the paragraph beginning "Links may be excessive even if they are informative"
Pollution has also increased due to the overall increase in shipping.
→A rise in shipping has also increased pollution
decrease
potentialincomeGrowing population during American rule
add article to beginning (e.g. a, the)what it was in 1951
what it had beenhad began to become apparent
were becoming apparent
Other
[edit]- Images:
- File:Philippine Island - Manila - NARA - 68156526.jpg Creation date should be made consistent
- File:Lanuza Bay fishing zones.JPG I think the copyright for this isn't the photo, but the map within. If you can clarify this / update that it would be helpful.
- Stable
- Broad / summary style I want to see more work on this, I will re-review
- Neutral Some normative claims around sustainability concerns, I will re-review as this may just be me. I have flagged one in the review.
- No COPYVIO / OR 29.6% Earwig, legislation titles