Talk:Fire in the Minds of Men

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Secret Societies (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Secret Societies, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Secret SocietiesWikipedia:WikiProject Secret SocietiesTemplate:WikiProject Secret SocietiesSecret Societies articles

Controversy

I am unclear as to what the 'recent controversy' section has to do with the book (other than the title). Can it please be clarified in the article? Thank you, Yodaat 20:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article contradicts itself

I don't understand the article's comment that G. W. Bush used the term "fire in the minds of men" in almost the opposite way as how it was used by Billington (and Dostoevsky) but then later it claims that G. W. Bush used it in nearly the same way that Dostoevsky used it. We can't have it both ways.

Reading G. W. Bush's comment it seems clear he used it in an opposite way than Billington and Dostoevsky and did not mean to endorse demonic forces. Regards, 67.160.93.208 13:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed controversy section

As it is not clear what it has to do with the book. In fact, from what is written, there is no controversy around the book. So, if you wish to keep it, please do clarify.

Many thanks, Yodaat 01:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fireinthemind.JPG

Image:Fireinthemind.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]