Talk:Fineness

Numismatics Low‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Bullion coin#Silver|silver bullion coins]] Anchor Bullion coin#Silver links to a specific web page: Silver. The anchor (#Silver) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Either broaden or delete article

The first paragraph of the lede defines "fineness" as Millesimal fineness. Since we already have an article on that topic, this article should be deleted if that is the primary focus.

If we don't want to delete the article, then I propose stating in the lede that fineness can be measured in any of several ways, then devoting more of the article to non-millesimal fineness measures, both contemporary and (presumaby non-Western) and historical. One alternative, in relation to twelve ounces troy, is already described. Now we just need more. Zyxwv99 (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the article is pretty lame. The real information is in millesimal fineness.

I think the article millesimal fineness should be merged into this one.

--BjKa (talk) 10:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merged

I have merged the articles Millesimal fineness and Carat (purity) with this one with redirects from both articles. I included all content from all articles so there may be some duplicate content. Martin Hogbin (talk) 09:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

there is no current article titled Carat (purity), and the links are redirected to the Fineness article. Someone please correct this. -Polytope4d (talk) 11:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait till i try to correct the links. Links on a page must not reload the same page again. -Polytope4d (talk) 11:32, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to correct; the pages were merged by consensus. Martin Hogbin (talk) 13:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fineness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130807053413/http://goldratefortoday.org:80/fineness-of-gold/ to http://goldratefortoday.org/fineness-of-gold/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 7 (to royalsilver.com) is a deadlink

The link regarding the five nines silver minted in Bolivia does not work. Madaman333 (talk) 23:26, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

875 fineness for Russian silver

Before switch to 900 in 1886 (to match LMU or French franc) Russian silver 25 kopek, 50 kopek and 1 ruble were in 83 1/3 zolotnik fineness. Which makes their fineness at 868 and not at 875. Catherine The Great silver coins were at 750 fineness. 78.56.84.144 (talk) 11:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]