Talk:Fine Art Trade Guild
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Speedy deletion
[edit]I understand your reasoning and have completly revised the text. I will watch the page to see if you have any other advice. --Tunebroker (talk) 10:40, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think it is improved. Shadowjams (talk) 10:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Do I remove the speedy deletion tags?--Tunebroker (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Technically an admin should come through and close the whole thing, but I'm not complaining. Shadowjams (talk) 00:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. Do I remove the speedy deletion tags?--Tunebroker (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
References
[edit]This article needs references that appear in reliable third party sources. TeapotgeorgeTalk 12:29, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hi, I am confused. I have read yeth Wikipedia guide on this. If the the official website is not reliable and web sites associated with Fine Art Trade Guild are not reliable. What do you suggest?
- The problem with any website controlled by the subject of an article is that it cannot be neutral - it will nearly always be biased in favour of the subject. And if no disinterested party has deemed the subject noteworthy enough to write about it, then, by Wikipedia definition, the subject is not noteable. dramatic (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The only book, I can find, with information on the Fine Art Trade Guild is by The Fine Art Trade Guild, which for Wikipedia purposes is not a reliable source, it being primary!
I look forward to your comments and hope to resolve this.--Tunebroker (talk) 12:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- It suggests to me that the "Fine Art Trade Guild" is not a notable subject for a Wikipedia article.TeapotgeorgeTalk 13:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Copyright Problem
[edit]I've created a new article at Talk:Fine Art Trade Guild/Temp to replace the existing version. It could probably do with some expansion. – Toon(talk) 16:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks I'll get to it when I can. Your input is appreciated.--Tunebroker (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. If you need any more help, feel free to ask. – Toon(talk) 19:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Fine Art Trade Guild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090818161908/http://www.business-support-wales.gov.uk:80/directories/directory_items/f/fine_art_trade_guild_fatg.aspx to http://www.business-support-wales.gov.uk/directories/directory_items/f/fine_art_trade_guild_fatg.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fine Art Trade Guild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205085659/http://www.pic.uk.net/pages/frame-advisory1.htm to http://pic.uk.net/pages/frame-advisory1.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090730052241/http://84.18.207.67/~ashworth/content.php?categoryId=91 to http://84.18.207.67/~ashworth/content.php?categoryId=91
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706025247/http://84.18.207.67/~ashworth/products.php?productId=534&categoryId=91&page=1 to http://84.18.207.67/~ashworth/products.php?productId=534&categoryId=91&page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)